我国“科学家研究”学术脉络与发展历程——基于文献计量与语义网络的方法  

Academic vein and field bias of "Scientists Study": Based on the methods of bibliometrics and semantic network analysis

作　　者：杨正 陈婧婧 Yang Zheng;Chen Jingjing(Soochow University,School of Communication,Suzhou 215123,China)

机构地区：[1]苏州大学传媒学院,江苏苏州215123

出　　处：《今日科苑》2023年第11期38-49,共12页Modern Science

基　　金：研究阐释党的十九届五中全会精神国家社科基金重点项目“数字化时代弘扬科学精神和传播工匠精神的长效机制研究”(项目编号:21AZD013)。

摘　　要：科学家研究作为明显具有跨学科与交叉学科属性的研究领域,一直备受科学学、科学哲学、科学史、科学社会学、科学传播、科学技术研究等学科的关注。但对于这一领域的系统性梳理分析较为缺乏。通过对1998至2021年中文社会科学引文索引期刊上刊登的“科学家研究”的相关学术论文的文献计量及知识语义网络的分析,发现科学家研究近年来受关注程度不断上升并逐渐发展为趋于稳定且规模化的研究领域,且随着时间推移呈现出越发明显的跨学科及多样化视角的态势。科学家研究从一个主要以哲学与史学为视阈的研究领域逐渐发展为更为细致化关注科学家群体的多样化微观行为、社会形象、心理状态的多理论、多视角、多方法的研究领域,这种微观化与细致化同时伴随着科学家研究的情境化态势。对于科学家研究领域关注焦点、学术脉络以及发展历程的分析,或可为“科学家研究”领域进一步规范化、学科化以及建制化的发展提供一定的借鉴。As a research field with obvious interdisciplinary attributes,"Scientists Study"is concerned by the Philosophy of Science,History of Science,Sociology of Science,Science Communication,Science Technology Studies and other science related disciplines.However,there is a lack of systematic analysis about this field.By analyzing the bibliometrics and knowledge semantic network of academic papers on"Scientists Studies"published in Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index journals from 1998 to 2021,this study finds that"Scientists Study"has been receiving increasing attentions in recent years and gradually developed into a stable and large-scale research field and shows a more and more obvious trend of interdisciplinary and diversified perspectives with development."Scientists Study"has gradually developed from a research field that was mainly from the philosophy and history perspective to a research field that paid more attentions to the diverse micro behaviors,social images and psychological states of scientists,with multiple theories,perspectives and methods.And this kind of microminiaturization is accompanied by the increasingly situational of"Scientists Study".The analysis of the focus,academic context and development process of"Scientists Study"may provide some references for the further standardization,disciplinary and institutional development of this academic field.

关 键 词：科学家研究 学术脉络 研究视阈 文献计量 语义网络 

分 类 号：G63[文化科学—教育学]