检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张会[1,2] Deirdre O'Donnell ZHANG Hui;Deirdre O'Donnell(Nursing Department,Jining No.1 People's Hospital,Jining 272000,China)
机构地区:[1]济宁市第一人民医院护理部,山东济宁272000 [2]爱尔兰都柏林大学护理/助产/卫生保健学院,爱尔兰都柏林D04 V1W8
出 处:《医学与哲学》2023年第22期6-10,共5页Medicine and Philosophy
基 金:2023年济宁市重点研发计划(软科学项目)(2023JNZC163)。
摘 要:在医疗决策领域,相对于共享决策,还有代理决策、支持决策两个SDM概念。系统回顾与比较了三种SDM决策类型的概念起源、定义特征及应用领域,同时梳理了三种概念之间的层次关系及内涵异同。三种SDM都是在“以患者为中心”文化驱动下的医疗决策类型,但其适用人群不同,且存在一定的隶属关系。基于中西方文化背景差异,进一步探讨了三种SDM概念对我国医疗决策实践的启示与建议,旨在为我国医疗决策工作的完善与提高提供更多依据。Within the realm of healthcare decision-making,shared decision-making(SDM1)stands alongside two distinct concepts,namely surrogate decision-making(SDM2)and supported decision-making(SDM3).This paper conducted a comparative analysis of the conceptual origins,defining characteristics,and applications domains of these three SDM decision types.In addition,the hierarchical relationships,connotative similarities and differences among them are elucidated.While all three types align with the"patient-centered care"culture,they cater to different populations with specific affiliations.In light of variances between Chinese and Western cultural contexts,this paper delves into the implications and recommendations of these three SDM concepts for healthcare decision-making practices in China.The aim is to furnish additional evidence supporting the refinement and advancement of decision-making within the Chinese healthcare system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145