检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:夏小涵 王萍 张静[1] XIA Xiao-han;WANG Ping;ZHANG Jing(College of Humanities,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 102488,China)
出 处:《医学与哲学》2023年第22期51-54,共4页Medicine and Philosophy
基 金:2022年中国卫生法学会-四川医事卫生法治中心项目(YF22-Y06)。
摘 要:随着医疗技术的进步,越来越多的父母选择产前检查服务,错误出生之诉也逐渐增加。目前我国司法实践中对错误出生之诉的赔偿范围与赔偿方式尚未形成统一的裁量标准,因此常常出现“同案不同判”的现象。通过筛选、梳理不同赔偿方案下的典型案例,对比中美两国司法实践中错误出生之诉的赔偿范围与赔偿方式,并结合我国错误出生之诉的现存问题,从赔偿范围的厘定、赔偿期限的明确、赔偿金的支付及监督等角度提出建议,以期对我国司法实践有所启示。As medical technology advances and more parents opt for prenatal examination,claims of wrongful birth are on the rise.However,the scope of compensation and method of compensation for claims of wrongful birth have not formed a unified discretion standard in China's judicial practice,often resulting in"different judgments for similar cases".By screening and sorting out typical cases under different compensation schemes,this paper compares the scope and method of compensation in the judicial practice of claims of wrongful birth in China and the United States.In light of the existing issues in China's wrongful birth lawsuits,recommendations are proposed from the perspectives of the defining the scope of compensation,specifying the compensation period,regulating the payment and supervision of compensation,etc.,with a view to enlightening the judicial practice in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13