资源依赖和柔性策略:政社合作如何影响环境治理?--基于26个案例的比较分析  

Resource Dependence and Non-Confrontational Strategies:How Does Political and Social Cooperation Influence Environmental Governance--A Comparative Analysis of 26 Cases

作　　者：周文星 程坤鹏 Zhou Wenxing;Cheng Kunpeng

机构地区：[1]南京大学国际关系学院 [2]南京大学华智全球治理研究院 [3]上海交通大学 [4]哈佛大学 [5]上海交通大学中国公益发展研究院 [6]宾夕法尼亚大学

出　　处：《中国社会组织研究》2023年第2期118-134,234,共18页CHINA SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS RESEARCH

摘　　要：保护生态环境、治理环境污染已成为迫切的民生诉求,环保NGO在此过程中扮演了非常重要的角色。为研究我国环保NGO的政策倡导机制及其对环境治理的影响,本文在制度主义视角下,分析社会变迁过程中社会组织参与环境治理的制度空间。在资源依赖理论分析层面,本文构建了一个以“柔性策略”为核心的多层次解释框架。研究发现,随着环境治理政策的迭代变化,环保NGO确有更大参与环境治理的行动空间,但环保组织资源汲取和组织行动能力尚不充分,政策倡导效能仍存在局限性。尽管如此,当下环保NGO政策倡导模式趋于稳定,环保NGO在依法倡导—公众参与—组织联动—媒体网络的倡导路径中实现了合法性和集体行动有效性的双重平衡。Protecting the ecological environment and containing the environmental pollution has become an urgent demand for people's livelihood in China.In order to study the mechanisms of environmental non-governmental organizations'(ENGOs)policy advocacy and their influence on environmental governance in China,this paper analyzes the institutional space for social organizations to participate in environmental governance in the process of social change from the perspective of institutionalism.It also constructs a multi-level framework centered on nonconfrontational strategies by drawing on resource dependence theory.This paper finds that China's ENGOs have gained more space to participate in governance due to the gradual change of environmental governance policy.However,the effectiveness of their policy advocacy is limited because their capabilities in resource absorption and organizational action are constrained by a variety of factors.In spite of this,policy advocacy models of ENGOs have become increasingly stabilized and they have achieved a dual balance between the effectiveness and legitimacy of collective action in law-based advocacy,public participation organizational integration,and media and Internet.

关 键 词：环保NGO 政策倡导 资源依赖 柔性策略 

分 类 号：X321[环境科学与工程—环境工程] F124.5[经济管理—世界经济]