检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈可炫 邓永光 吴铁钧[2] Chen Kexuan;Deng Yongguang;Wu Tiejun(Department of Social Service,Suzhou City University,Suzhou,Jiangsu 215104,China;School of Education,Soochow University,Suzhou,Jiangsu 215123,China)
机构地区:[1]苏州城市学院社会服务系,江苏苏州215104 [2]苏州大学教育学院,江苏苏州215123
出 处:《校园心理》2024年第1期37-41,共5页Journal of Campus Life & Mental Health
基 金:江苏省大学生创新创业训练计划(202213983028Y)。
摘 要:目的探究社会困境下不同社会价值取向与社会距离对中国大学生合作行为的影响特点。方法选取60名在校大学生进行囚徒困境测验,采取2(价值取向:亲自我取向和亲社会取向)×4(社会距离:家人、同学、老乡和陌生人)混合实验设计。结果社会距离的主效应具有统计学意义,价值取向的主效应和交互作用不具有统计学意义,当对象为家人时,被试的合作率高于老乡、同学、陌生人。结论人们的合作行为受社会距离的影响,相比较亲自我者,亲社会者对老乡表现出了更多的合作行为。Objective To explore the influence of different social value orientation and social distance on the cooperative behavior of Chinese college students.Methods A total of 60 undergraduates were selected to participate in the prisoner's dilemma paradigm.2(social value orientation:prosocial us pro-self)×4(social distance:family,classmate,fellow townsman and stranger)within-subject experiment was designed to test the hypothesis.Results The main effect of social distance was significant,while the main effect of value orientation and its interaction were not significant.When the subjects faced their family members,their cooperative behavior was significantly higher than that of facing fellow townsmen,classmates and strangers.Conclusion People's cooperative behavior is affected by the social distance,and the prosocial people show more cooperative tendency than the pro-self people when facing their fellow townsmen.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28