检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高汉培 黄宇辰 周广东 纪旭 乔雅静 孙艳[2] Gao Hanpei;Huang Yuchen;Zhou Guangdong;Ji Xu;Qiao Yajing;Sun Yan(Faculty of Psychology,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300387;National Institute on Drug Dependence,Peking University,Beijing 100191;Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of Ministry of Education,Academy of Psychology and Behavior,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300387;Tianjin Social Science Laboratory of Students’Mental Development and Learning,Tianjin 300387)
机构地区:[1]天津师范大学心理学部,天津300387 [2]北京大学中国药物依赖性研究所,北京100191 [3]教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院,天津300387 [4]学生心理发展与学习天津市高校社会科学实验室,天津300387
出 处:《心理学探新》2023年第6期567-574,共8页Psychological Exploration
基 金:科技部科技创新2030(2022ZD0211200)。
摘 要:目的:在中国大学生群体中进行翻译并修订社会性奖赏问卷(Social Reward Questionnaire,SRQ),据此考察中国大学生的社会性奖赏水平。方法:采用方便取样法和滚雪球抽样法调查8275名大学生,以此来检验SRQ的问卷结构,并以大五人格简式版(Chinese Big Five Personality Inventory brief version,CBF-PI-B)的开放性、外向性、神经质维度以及奖励与惩罚敏感性问卷(The Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire,SPSRQ)作为效标进行效度检验。结果:经分析后,中文版SRQ保留了原问卷的钦佩性、负性社交效价、被动性、社交性、性关系的五因素结构,共21条目,每个维度3~7个条目,累积方差解释率65.66%,各个因子的因子载荷为0.62~0.86。CFA结果为RMSEA=0.047,CFI=0.94,TLI=0.93,SRMR=0.047。SRQ总分及分维度的内部一致性信度为0.70~0.88、分半信度为0.71~0.89、重测信度(ICC)为0.75~0.94,问卷在不同性别学生之间具有完全的测量等值性(ΔCFI<0.01,ΔRMSEA<0.01)。结论:修订后的SRQ中文版具有较好的信度和效度,是测量中国大学生群体社会性奖赏的合适工具。Objective:The Social Reward Questionnaire(SRQ)is to be translated and revised among Chinese college students,based on which the social reward level of Chinese college students is to be investigated.Method:The convenient sampling method and snowball sampling method were used to investigate 8275 college students to test the SRQ questionnaire structure.Chinese Big Five Personality Inventory brief version(CBF-PI-B),The Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire(SPSRQ)as a criterion for validity test.Results:After three exploratory factor analyses,the Chinese SRQ retained the five-factor structure of admiration,negative social titer,passivity,sociability and sexual relationship of the original questionnaire,with a total of 21 items with 3-7 items per dimension,cumulative variance explanation rate 65.66%,and the factor load of each factor ranges from 0.62 to 0.86.The CFA results were RMSEA=0.047,CFI=0.94,TLI=0.93,SRMR=0.047.The internal consistency reliability of SRQ total score and fractal dimension is 0.70~0.88,split half reliability is 0.71~0.89,retest reliability(ICC)is 0.75~0.94,and the questionnaire has complete measurement equivalence between different genders(ΔCFI<0.01,ΔRMSEA<0.01).Conclusion:The revised Chinese version of SRQ has good reliability and validity,and is a suitable tool to measure the social reward of Chinese college students.
分 类 号:B841.2[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30