检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢妍妍 王佳彤 刘蒙之[1] Xie Yanyan;Wang Jiatong;Liu Mengzhi(School of Journalism&Communication,Shaanxi Normal University,Xi’an,710119;Communication Research Institute,Communication University of China,Beijing,100024)
机构地区:[1]陕西师范大学新闻与传播学院,西安710119 [2]中国传媒大学传播研究院,北京100024
出 处:《出版科学》2024年第1期39-51,共13页Publishing Journal
摘 要:基于87篇编辑职业话语文本,探讨编辑在职业话语言说中表达的职业权威建构问题。编辑权威作为一种被合法化的权力,指导着编辑通过专业知识、道德准则和职业规范与社会达成契约,在编辑实践中运用知识和智慧做出正确的判断和决策。制度保障为编辑提供的决策权和影响力、编辑自身修炼的专业知识与技能以及相关社群的支持与信任共同建构起编辑的职业权威。认知合法性、道德合法性与同行共识合法性这三种合法性机制共同塑造了编辑权威的社会认可基础,揭示了构成编辑权威的复杂社会机制。Based on 87 texts of professional discourse within the editing domain,this study explores the issue of professional authority construction expressed by editors in professional discourse.Editorial authority,legitimized as a form of power,guides editors to establish legitimacy through professional knowledge,ethical standards,and occupational norms,forming a contractual agreement with society.In the practice of editing,editors apply their knowledge and wisdom to make informed judgments and decisions.The institutional guarantees,decision-making authority,and influence provided to editors,coupled with the cultivation of professional knowledge and skills through self-discipline and the support and trust of relevant communities,collectively construct the professional authority of editors.The three legitimacy mechanisms-cognitive legitimacy,moral legitimacy,and consensus legitimacy-shape the social acceptance foundation of editorial authority,revealing the intricate social mechanisms that constitute editorial authority.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.71.161