检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李涵笑 LI Han-xiao(China Academy of Discipline Inspection and Supervision,Beijing 100088,China)
机构地区:[1]中国纪检监察学院党建教研部,北京100088
出 处:《陕西行政学院学报》2024年第1期53-59,共7页Journal of Shaanxi Academy of Governance
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“中国轻罪治理模式研究”(21BFX068)。
摘 要:法治反腐败不仅具有政治学、经济学上的意义,更具有人权保障的重要价值。刑事撤诉作为反腐败法治化进程中与人权保障息息相关的刑事制度,是衡量反腐败法治化、规范化水平的重要标尺。因此,亟须立足于法治反腐败视野下刑事撤诉人权保障的现实图景,明确刑事撤诉中各方主体对人权保障原则的普遍性与特殊性需求。从重塑立法基础规范、完善司法赋权机制、建构权利救济路径三个维度入手,探析刑事撤诉制度中人权保障功能的实现进路。The rule of law against corruption not only is of political and economic significance,but also reveals important value in safeguarding human rights.Criminal withdrawal,as a criminal system,closely related to human rights guarantee in the process of anti-corruption by rule of law,is an important yardstick for measuring the level of anti-corruption by rule of law and standardization.Therefore,it is urgent to establish a realistic scheme of human rights protection in criminal withdrawal from the perspective of the rule of law against corruption,and clarify the universal and special needs of all parties in the principle of human rights protection in criminal withdrawal.This paper analyzes the realization of human rights guarantee in the criminal withdrawal system from three dimensions:reshaping the legislative foundation norms,improving the judicial empowerment mechanism,and constructing a path for rights relief.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90