检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄一洲 谭郑雨 HUANG Yizhou;TAN Zhengyu(Department of Philosophy Research,Party School of the Guangdong Provincial Committee of the Communist Party of China,Guangzhou 510053,China)
机构地区:[1]中共广东省委党校哲学教研部,广东广州510053
出 处:《医学与哲学》2024年第3期49-53,共5页Medicine and Philosophy
摘 要:基于对生成式人工智能医学能力、风险以及第三者效应的综合考量,分析生成式人工智能介入医患关系可能构成的四种伦理转向:即“医-人工智能-患”共同决策模式(可能Ⅰ)、“患-人工智能”深度协作与医生保守立场(可能Ⅱ)、恢复传统“医-患”关系(可能Ⅲ)以及“医-人工智能”深度协作与患者保守立场(可能Ⅳ)。其中“医-人工智能-患”共同决策模式的交互本质可能进一步形成两种相互背离的发展取向:一是以患者为中心的医疗实践模式,二是计算机主义的医疗家长主义。Based on a comprehensive assessment of the medical capabilities,risks,and third-party effects of generative artificial intelligence(AI),this paper analyzes four potential ethical shifts in doctor-patient relationships resulting from the intervention of generative AI:"Doctor-AI-Patient"shared decision-making model(possibilityⅠ),"Patient-AI"deep collaboration with a conservative doctor's stance(possibilityⅡ),the restoration of the traditional"Doctor-Patient"relationship(possibilityⅢ),and"Doctor-AI"deep collaboration with a conservative patient's stance(possibilityⅣ).The interactive nature of"Doctor-AIPatient"shared decision-making model may lead to the development of two mutually exclusive orientations:the patient-centered medical practice model or the computational medical paternalism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.22.242.110