检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:呼子宇 李紫晗 孙浩[1,2] 魏立新[1,2] 王聪[1,2] HU Zi-yu;LI Zi-han;SUN Hao;WEI Li-xin;WANG Cong(School of Electrical Engineering,Yanshan University,Qinhuangdao 066004,China;Engineering Research Center of the Ministry of Education for Intelligent Control System and Intelligent Equipment,Yanshan University,Qinhuangdao 066004,China)
机构地区:[1]燕山大学电气工程学院,河北秦皇岛066004 [2]燕山大学智能控制系统与智能装备教育部工程研究中心,河北秦皇岛066004
出 处:《控制与决策》2024年第1期78-86,共9页Control and Decision
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(62003296,62073276);国家重点研究开发计划项目(2018YFB1702300);河北自然科学基金项目(F2020203031);河北省教育厅科技项目(QN2020225)。
摘 要:动态多目标优化问题(DMOPs)需要进化算法跟踪不断变化的Pareto最优前沿,从而在检测到环境变化时能够及时有效地做出响应.为了解决上述问题,提出一种基于决策变量关系的动态多目标优化算法.首先,通过决策变量对收敛性和多样性贡献大小的检测机制将决策变量分为收敛性相关决策变量(CV)和多样性相关决策变量(DV),对不同类型决策变量采用不同的优化策略;其次,提出一种局部搜索多样性维护机制,使个体在Pareto前沿分布更加均匀;最后,对两部分产生的组合个体进行非支配排序构成新环境下的种群.为了验证DVR的性能,将DVR与3种动态多目标优化算法在15个基准测试问题上进行比较,实验结果表明, DVR算法相较于其他3种算法表现出更优的收敛性和多样性.Dynamic multi-objective optimization problems require evolutionary algorithms(EAs)to track the changing Pareto-optimal front(PF)at different times,then can respond effectively and timely when environmental changes are detected.In order to solve the above problem,a dynamic multi-objective optimization algorithm based on the relationship of decision variables is proposed.Firstly,through the detection mechanism of the contribution of decision variables to convergence and diversity,the decision variables are divided into convergence decision variables(CV)and diversity decision variables(DV).Secondly,different optimization strategies are adopted for different types of decision variables.And a local search diversity maintenance mechanism is proposed to make individuals more evenly distributed in the Pareto front.Finally,the non-dominated sort of the combined solutions generated by the two parts constitutes the population in the new environment.In order to verify the performance of relationship of decision variables,relationship of decision variables is compared with three dynamic multi-objective optimization evolutionary algorithms on the 15 benchmark functions.Experimental results demonstrate that the DVR algorithm exhibits better convergence and distribution than the other three algorithms.
关 键 词:动态多目标优化 进化算法 预测 决策变量关系 引导个体 多样性保持
分 类 号:TP273[自动化与计算机技术—检测技术与自动化装置]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.12.163.164