检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李雪 汪延明 田芹 张弘旺 LI Xue;WANG Yanming;TIAN Qin;ZHANG Hongwang(Postgraduate Training Base of 960th Hospital of PLA,Jinzhou Medical University,Jinzhou 121012,Liaoning,China;Department of Radiation Oncology,960th Hospital of PLA,Jinan 250031,Shandong,China;Department of Radiation Oncology,Shandong Provincial Third Hospital,Jinan 250031,Shandong,China)
机构地区:[1]锦州医科大学解放军第九六〇医院研究生培养基地,辽宁锦州121012 [2]解放军第九六〇医院放疗科,山东济南250031 [3]山东省立第三医院放疗科,山东济南250031
出 处:《中国现代医生》2024年第5期51-56,共6页China Modern Doctor
摘 要:目的探讨射波刀治疗老年(≥75岁)早期非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)患者的有效性与安全性,并与<75岁患者的结果对比。方法回顾性分析2013年1月至2019年10月济南市解放军第960医院收治的75例早期(T1-2N0M0)NSCLC患者。<75岁患者32例(42.7%),≥75岁患者43例(57.3%)。所有患者剂量方案为45~66Gy/3~8F,60%~85%等剂量线作为处方剂量包绕计划靶区(planning target volume,PTV),每日1次,每周5次。比较两组患者临床治疗效果、生存状况及治疗毒性,并分析影响≥75岁患者生存期的因素。结果<75岁和≥75岁患者疾病控制率分别为96.9%和93.0%(P>0.05)。5年局部控制率(local control,LC)、无进展生存率(progression-free survival,PFS)和癌症特异性生存率(cancer-specific survival,CSS)分别为70.9%和85.4%,58.5%和54.4%,70.4%和64.5%,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。但≥75岁患者的生存率(overall survival,OS)明显低于<75岁患者,5年OS分别为49.2%和68.2%(P<0.05)。两组患者的治疗并发症比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。多因素分析发现生物等效剂量(biologic effective dose,BED)是影响老年患者OS的独立因素。结论采用射波刀对不适合手术的老年早期NSCLC患者行立体定向放射治疗是一种安全有效的治疗方式。Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of Cyberknife in the treatment of elderly patients(aged≥75 years)with early stage non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC),and to compare the results with those of patients aged<75 years.Methods We retrospectively analyzed 75 patients with early(T1-2N0M0)NSCLC admitted to the 960th Hospital of Jinan People’s Liberation Army from January 2013 to October 2019.There were 32(42.7%)patients aged<75 years,and 43(57.3%)patients aged≥75 years.All patients were treated with 45–66Gy/3–8F,60%–85%isodose line as the prescription dose to cover planning target volume(PTV),and irradiation once a day and five times a week.The clinical efficacy,survival status and radiotherapy toxicity of the two groups were compared,and the factors affecting the efficacy of elderly patients were analyzed.Results The disease control rates of patients aged<75 and≥75 years were 96.9%and 93.0%,respectively(P>0.05).The 5-year local control rate(LC),progression-free survival(PFS)and cancer-specific survival(CSS)were 70.9%and 85.4%,58.5%and 54.4%,and 70.4%and 64.5%,respectively(P>0.05).However,the overall survival(OS)of patients aged≥75 years was significantly lower than that of patients aged<75 years,and the 5-year OS was 49.2%and 68.2%,respectively(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the treatment complications between the two groups(P>0.05).Multivariate analysis showed that biologic effective dose(BED)was an independent factor affecting OS in patients aged≥75 years.Conclusion Stereotactic body radiotherapy with cyberknife is a safe and effective treatment for elderly patients with early stage NSCLC who are not suitable for surgery.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117