论规范的故意概念对不法与罪责区分论之否定——从一个学术史的考察开始谈起  

The Negation on the Dichotomy Between Wrongdoing and Guilt by Normalized Concept of Criminal Intention——Start with an Investigation of Academic History

作　　者：石佳宇 SHI Jia-yu(Research Center of Criminal Justice,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学刑事法律科学研究中心,北京100872

出　　处：《华北电力大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第1期88-97,共10页Journal of North China Electric Power University(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：从学术史的发展角度看,不法与罪责的主客观二分具有多义性。随着法益侵害判断的主观化与归责理论“客观化”原则的倾塌,故意犯在不法层面的行为归属判断的主观性格日渐显现。犯罪故意不是事实的心理要素而是具有规范功能的判断要件。规范的犯罪故意概念应包含认知、行为决意与情绪意志三部分,其中违法性认识应填充于情绪意志之中从而架构起犯罪故意的规范面向,而期待可能性作为个人的行为能力判断则是规范故意的成立前提。至此,罪责阶层的两大主观化要素统一于规范的犯罪故意概念,既有的不法与罪责的二分法将名存实亡。From the perspective of academic history,the subjective and objective dichotomy between wrongdoing and guilt has different meanings.With the collapse of the principle of"objectification"of the subjectivity of legal interest infringement judgment and attribution theory,the subjective character of the illegal behavior attribution judgment is increasingly apparent.The criminal intention is not the psychological element of the fact but the judgment element with the normative function.The concept of normative criminal intention should include three parts:cognition,behavior determination and emotional will,in which the understanding of illegality should be filled in the emotional will so as to construct the normative face of criminal intention,while the judgment of expectation possibility is the premise for the establishment of normative intention.At this point,the two subjective elements of the criminal class are unified in the concept of normative criminal intent,and the existing dichotomy of illegal and guilt will exist in name only.

关 键 词：不法 罪责 规范故意 违法性认识 期待可能性 

分 类 号：D909.565[政治法律—法学理论]