调均之道:儒家井田制的两种模式及其意义  

Art of Tiaojun:Two Confucian Models of the Well-Field System and Their Significance

作　　者：王淇 Wang Qi

机构地区：[1]重庆大学哲学系,重庆400044

出　　处：《中国经济史研究》2024年第1期71-84,共14页Researches in Chinese Economic History

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目《近现代中国价值观念史》(批准号:18ZDA020)子课题《经世济民的理念与经济观念的演变》;国家社会科学基金青年项目《先秦两汉儒学视域中的“制器”观念研究》(批准号:21CZX031)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：长期以来,儒家井田论被打上复古、迁阔的标签。本文通过将经学视角引入并田制的经济思想史脉络,尝试重新激活井田问题。现代学术将井田制视为西周时期的土地制度,而往往忽视了制度背后的价值追求。简言之,经典世界中的井田制表现为两种模式,分别以《公羊传》《周礼》两经及其汉代解释为代表。两种模式分别指向不同的经济平等观念,今文学重视“均劳逸”,古文学重视“均赋役”。一种具备了经学视角的经济思想史,有助于揭示出制度建构的价值基础是如何形成的。For a long time,the Confucian theory of the well-field system has been labeled as outdated and pedantic.In contrast,this article attempts to show the significance of the study of the well-field system.To this end,it adopts a perspective of classic hermeneutics.Modern scholarship regards the well-field system as a land system in the West Zhou dynasty,and thus ignores the value pursuits behind it.Indeed,the wellfield system in Confucian classical works manifests itself in two models,which refer to different conceptions of economic equality.One is the balance between work and leisure,while the other is the balance between taxation and corvee.

关 键 词：井田制 调均 经济平等 

分 类 号：B222[哲学宗教—中国哲学] F329[经济管理—产业经济]