机构地区:[1]安徽医科大学附属省立医院神经内科,合肥230001
出 处:《中华神经医学杂志》2023年第12期1242-1247,共6页Chinese Journal of Neuromedicine
基 金:"科大新医学"联合基金立项项目(2022)。
摘 要:目的探讨大血管闭塞型急性缺血性脑卒中(LVO-AIS)患者接受血管内机械取栓术(EVT)后3个月预后和血浆Elabela水平的关系。方法前瞻性选取安徽医科大学附属省立医院神经内科自2020年8月至2022年8月采用EVT治疗的94例LVO-AIS患者。术前、术后24 h和术后72 h采用ELISA法检测患者血浆Elabela水平,术后3个月采用改良Rankin量表(mRS)评估患者的预后。比较预后良好组与预后不良组患者临床资料、血浆Elabela水平的差异,采用多因素Logistic回归分析明确LVO-AIS患者术后3个月预后的独立影响因素,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析血浆Elabela水平对LVO-AIS患者术后3个月预后的预测效能。结果与预后不良组比较,预后良好组患者有脑卒中史、糖尿病者占比较低,入院时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分较低,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。预后良好组患者术后72 h的血浆Elabela水平高于预后不良组患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,脑卒中史(OR=0.148,P=0.037,95%CI:0.025~0.889)、糖尿病(OR=0.205,P=0.027,95%CI:0.050~0.836)、高血压(OR=3.488,P=0.024,95%CI:1.177~10.339)、术后72 h Elabela水平(OR=1.064,P=0.005,95%CI:1.019~1.111)是LVO-AIS患者术后3个月预后的独立影响因素。ROC曲线分析显示,术后72 h血浆Elabela水平预测LVO-AIS患者术后3个月预后的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.718(P<0.001,95%CI:0.614~0.822)。结论术后72 h血浆Elabela水平可能是预测LVO-AIS患者EVT术后近期预后的潜在生物标志物。Objective To explore the relation of plasma Elabela with 3-month prognoses in large vessel occlusion-acute ischemic stroke(LVO-AIS)patients accepted endovascular thrombectomy(EVT).Methods A prospective study was performed;94 LVO-AIS patients aceepted EVT in Department of Neurology,Anhui Provincal Hospital,Anhui Medical University from August 2020 to August 2022 were selected.Plasma Elabela was detected before EVT,and 24 and 72 h after EVT.Modified Rankin scale(mRS)was used to evaluate the prognoses of the patients 3 months after EVT;differences in clinical data and plasma Elabela level between the good prognosis group and poor prognosis group were compared.Independent influencing factors for prognoses of LVO-AIS patients 3 months after EVT were analyzed by multivariate Logistic regression.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was used to analyze the efficacy of Elabela in predicting prognoses of patients with LVO-AIS 3 months after EVT.Results Compared with the poor prognosis group,the good prognosis group had significantly lower percentages of patients with stroke history and diabetes,and lower NIHSS scores at admission(P<0.05).Elabela level in the good prognosis group was significantly higher than that in the poor prognosis group 72 h after EVT(P<0.05).Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that stroke history(OR=0.148,P=0.037,95%CI:0.025-0.889),diabetes mellitus(OR=0.148,P=0.037,95%CI:0.025-0.889),hypertension history(OR=3.488,P=0.024,95%CI:1.177-10.339),and Elabela level 72 h after EVT(OR=1.064,P=0.005,95%CI:1.019-1.111)were independent influencing factors for prognoses of LVO-AIS patients 3 months after EVT.ROC curve showed that area under ROC curve of plasma Elabela level 72 h after EVT in predicting prognosies of LVO-AIS patients 3 months after surgery was 0.718(P<0.001,95%CI:0.614-0.822).Conclusion Plasma Elabela level 72 h after EVT may be a potential prognostic biomarker for LVO-AIS patients after EVT.
关 键 词:急性缺血性脑卒中 血管内机械取栓术 Elabela 预后 生物标志物
分 类 号:R743.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...