走向“超实践美学”——后理论时代中国当代美学建构的第三条道路  

Going Towards"Chao-praxis Aesthetics":The Third Path to the Construction of Contemporary Chinese Aesthetics in the Post-theoretical Era

作　　者：肖建华[1] XIAO Jianhua(College of Humanities,Guangzhou University,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510006,China)

机构地区：[1]广州大学人文学院,广东广州510006

出　　处：《广州大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第1期41-56,共16页Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(20BZW026)。

摘　　要：实践美学重视以物质生产为中心的实践活动,而后实践美学则采取了一种“去实践化”的举动。实践美学和后实践美学共享着同一种有关实践的理念,即都对实践作了一种非哲学的、社会学化的、历史科学化的理解。20世纪西方的实践哲学和美学转向提出了“审美在何种意义上是一种实践”这个大问题。审美可以是一种实践,但不是实践美学和后实践美学眼中的实践,而是一种奠基在源初的生活世界中的前反思性的现象学意义上的实践。“超实践”不是不要实践,而是回到一种带有原发性的、主客未分状态下的前反思性实践。超实践美学建立在一种崭新的“超实践”观的基础上,是后理论时代中国当代美学建构中出现的一种新的美学形态,是中国当代美学研究的第三条道路。Practice aesthetics emphasizes practical activities centered around material production,while post-practice aesthetics takes a"de-practice"strategy.Practice aesthetics and post-practice aesthetics share the same understanding for practice,that is to say,they both have a non-philosophical,sociological,and historical scientific understanding of practice.The practical turn of the contemporary philosophy and aesthetics in the West has raised the big question how the aesthetic could be regarded as a practice.The aesthetic could be a form of practice,not from the perspective of practice aesthetics and postpractice aesthetics,but rather a pre-reflective phenomenological praxis rooted in the primordial lifeworld."Chao-praxis"is not de-practice,but returning to a pre-reflective primordial praxis,where the subject and object are not separated."Chao-praxis aesthetics"is established on the basis of a brand new Chao-praxis"notion,It is a new aesthetic paradigm emerging in the construction of contemporary Chinese aesthetics in the post-theoretical era,and it provides the third path for contemporary Chinese aesthetics research.

关 键 词：实践美学 后实践美学 实践 超实践 超实践美学 

分 类 号：B83-06[哲学宗教—美学]