检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵新宽[1] 林溪[1] 郑欣敏 刘二涛[1] ZHAO Xinkuan;LIN Xi;ZHENG Xinmin;LIU Ertao(Zhuhai City Polytechnic,Zhuhai 519000,China)
出 处:《职业技术》2024年第3期60-66,共7页Vocational Technology
基 金:广东省教育科学规划领导小组办公室2022年度教育科学规划课题(高等教育专项)“粤港澳大湾区背景下高职专业群治理体系研究:基于系统权变理论”(2022GXJK592)。
摘 要:多主体协同治理是现阶段提升职业教育适应性、实现高职专业群高质量发展的必然选择。针对当前高职专业群存在的“治理体系不完善或管理机制缺乏”等问题,在调研25个广东省省级高水平专业群的基础上,基于系统权变理论提出了多主体协同治理下的权力分配原则和方法,设计了满足“多元共治”要求的专业群管理机制簇,并给出了具体应用案例。实践证明,基于系统权变理论的高职专业群多主体协同机制能从根本上支撑专业群“多元共治”。The adoption of multi-subject collaborative governance is an inevitable choice for enhancing the adaptability of vocational education and achieving high-quality development of higher vocational major groups.In view of the problems such as“imperfect governance system or lack of management mechanism”existing in the current higher vocational major groups,based on the investigation of 25 provincial high-level major groups in Guangdong province,based on the systematic contingency theory,the principle and method of power distribution under multi-subject collaborative governance are proposed;the management mechanism cluster of major groups meeting the requirements of“multiple co-governance”is designed;and specific application cases are given.Practice has proved that the multi-subject collaborative mechanism of higher vocational major groups based on the systematic contingency theory can fundamentally support the“multiple co-governance”of major groups.
分 类 号:G710[文化科学—职业技术教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222