检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:程丽琴[1] Cheng Liqin(Xiangyang Polytechnic,Xiangyang Hubei 441021,China)
机构地区:[1]襄阳职业技术学院附属医院,湖北襄阳441021
出 处:《襄阳职业技术学院学报》2024年第1期105-107,共3页Journal of Xiangyang Polytechnic
摘 要:目的探讨磨牙根管治疗后直接充填治疗与全冠修复治疗的牙体保存率差别。方法选取我院口腔科2017年10月至2020年10月62例磨牙根管治疗患者进行效果追踪调查。结果随访2年,全冠修复治疗患者的牙体保存率明显优于直接充填治疗患者,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论磨牙根管治疗后及时进行全冠修复可有效保存患者牙体,延长患牙使用时间,减少患者失牙痛苦,从而更有效地提高患者生活质量,值得推广。Objective:Exploring the difference in tooth preservation rate between direct filling treatment and full crown restoration treatment after root canal treatment of molars.Methods:The study selected 62 patients with root canal treatment of molars in the Department of Stomatology of our hospital from October 2017 to October 2020 for follow-up investigation of the effectiveness.Results:Following up for 2 years,the tooth preservation rate of patients with crown restoration was significantly higher than that of patients with direct filling treatment,and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Timely full crown restoration after root canal treatment of molars can effectively preserve the patient’s tooth and prolong the service life of the affected tooth.Reducing the pain of tooth loss in patients and improving their quality of life more effectively is worth promoting on a large scale.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28