再论环境行政执法与刑事司法的衔接  

Revisiting the Linkage between Environmental Administrative Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice

作　　者：梅扬[1] 王森弘 Mei Yang;Wang Senhong

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072 [2]河南财经政法大学法学院,河南郑州450046

出　　处：《湖湘法学评论》2024年第1期121-132,共12页HUXIANG LAW REVIEW

基　　金：司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目:行政裁决救济制度研究(20SFB3009)。

摘　　要：环境犯罪具有行政从属性,是国家基于宏观政策对行政处罚与刑罚的整体考量,旨在用较小成本实现高效管理的同时,避免违反罪刑法定原则。环境行政执法与刑事司法的衔接是为了实质性解决环境犯罪问题,在此过程中应遵循刑事优先原则,当行政手段无法起到充分评价其社会危害性和保护法益之效用时,适用震慑力更强的司法程序。在实践中,环境行政执法与刑事司法的衔接仍存在标准不明确、证据转化难等问题,这些问题会导致案件移送不力、以罚代刑等现象长期存在。故而,在衔接过程中应明确移送案件的标准、完善证据转化制度以及加强检察监督,构建环境行政执法与刑事司法的有效衔接机制,更加充分地保护生态环境。Environmental crime has administrative subordination,which is the overall consideration of the state on administrative punishment and penalty based on macro-policy,aiming to achieve efficient management with low cost and avoid violating the principle of legal punishment.The connection between environmental administrative law enforcement and criminal justice is to effectively solve the problem of environmental crime,and the principle of criminal priority should be followed in the process of connection.When administrative means cannot fully evaluate the social harm and the benefit of the protection law,the judicial still erist with stronger deterrent force should be applied.In practice,some problems still exist in the connection of the two,such as unclear premise and difficult transformation of evidence,which will lead to ineffective case transfer and the phenomenon of substituting punishment for punishment.Therefore,in the process of connection,we should lower the standard of transferring cases,improve the evidence conversion system and strengthen procuratorial supervision,build an effective connection mechanism,and fully protect the ecological environment.

关 键 词：环境犯罪 行政执法 刑事司法 两法衔接 

分 类 号：X197[环境科学与工程—环境科学]