将“受过行政处罚”注入定罪机制的反思与完善  

Reflection and Improvement of Putting Administrative Sanctions into Conviction Mechanism

作　　者：朱怡鸣 Zhu Yiming(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学,上海200042

出　　处：《安徽警官职业学院学报》2023年第6期51-57,共7页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers

摘　　要：“受过行政处罚”可以对定罪量刑产生影响,相关规定在我国刑法和司法解释中占有一定数量,其定罪功能在刑法体系中具有独特的法律作用,可以作为犯罪构成要件、降低入罪门槛的依据等。在法律地位上主要是归属于犯罪的情节要素从而被摄入到罪量范畴。“受过行政处罚”对定罪功能影响的正当性依据主要包括以下三个方面:刑事治理的功能转型、主客观要件的双重质变、司法认定标准的明晰。但在实践中需要对前置性行政处罚进行限制和明确,同时也要对后行为是否入罪进行实质性判断。Administrative sanctions can have an impact on conviction and sentencing.Relevant regulations occupy a certain number in China’s criminal law and judicial interpretation.Its conviction function has a unique legal role in the criminal law system.It can be used as a constituent element of the crime and a basis for lowering the threshold for conviction.In terms of legal status,it is mainly the elements of the plot that belong to the crime and are thus ingested into the category of crime.The basis for the legitimacy of the impact of“administrative sanctions”on the function of conviction mainly includes the following three aspects:the functional transformation of criminal governance,the dual qualitative change of subjective and objective elements,and the clarity of judicial recognition standards.However,in practice,it is necessary to limit and clarify the prepositive administrative punishment,and at the same time,it is necessary to make a substantive judgment on whether the subsequent behavior is criminalized.

关 键 词：行政处罚 犯罪构成 人身危险性 社会危害性 

分 类 号：D915[政治法律—诉讼法学]