检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张永进 邵威 Zhang Yongjin;Shao Wei(School of Humanity and Law,Hebei University of Engineering,Handan 056038,China;School of Law and Politics,Hebei Normal University,Shijiazhuang 050010,China)
机构地区:[1]河北工程大学文法学院,河北邯郸056038 [2]河北师范大学法政学院,河北石家庄050010
出 处:《铁道警察学院学报》2023年第6期71-77,共7页Journal of Railway Police College
基 金:2019年河北省社科基金项目“河北检察办案中的人工智能应用研究”(HB19FX012);河北省法学会2023年度一般课题“检察听证制度现代化改革研究”(HBF23B043)。
摘 要:检察听证制度是保障人民群众参与司法,坚持人民司法为人民,依靠人民公正司法的重要体现。检察听证制度具有公开性、程序性和多样性的特点。当前我国检察听证制度从整体上属于行政型模式,在接受监督、确保公开、增加民众参与性、确保民众听证权利等方面仍然存在一定问题。检察听证制度应当从行政型转化为司法型模式,进一步加强对听证程序监督,增强听证公开性,扩大听证参与性,推动检察听证与现代科技的深度融合。The procuratorial hearing system is an important embodiment of ensuring people’s participation in justice,adhering to the people’s judiciary for the people,and relying on the people for justice.It has the characteristics of openness,procedure and diversity.At present,the procuratorial hearing system in China generally belongs to the administrative one,which still has difficulties in accepting supervision,ensuring openness,encouraging the public participation and protecting the people’s rights.Therefore,it should be reformed from administrative to judicial one by further strengthening the supervision of the hearing procedure,enhancing the openness,expanding the participation,and promoting the deep integration of the procuratorial hearing and modern technology.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.224.184.41