检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:方勇[1] 汪楚媛 苑怡 陈雪艳 FANG Yong;WANG Chuyuan;YUAN Yi;CHEN Xueyan(School of Economics and Management,Beijing University of Chemical Technology,Beijing 100029,China;National Center for Science&Technology Evaluation,Beijing 100081,China)
机构地区:[1]北京化工大学经济管理学院,北京100029 [2]国家科技评估中心,北京100081
出 处:《科技管理学报》2024年第1期1-11,共11页Journal of Science and Technology Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(J2124014)。
摘 要:对国家自然科学基金探索开展长周期、学术性与社会影响的全面系统的影响评估,有助于全面总结基金资助的广泛经济社会影响,并提出更为有效的资助方式。本文基于变革理论和因果链分析,首先清晰界定了基础研究计划影响和影响评估的概念;然后从变革的发展阶段综合考虑科学基金的学术与社会影响,构建出“科研产出、科研影响、科研环境”的多维影响评估逻辑,由此设计了国家自然科学基金影响评估的逻辑框架;进一步以国家自然科学基金的一个资助计划为典型案例,从该计划的定位、目标、成效出发,依据影响评估的逻辑框架设计出具体评估内容,并提出了开展基础研究计划影响评估的政策建议。Since the 18th Party Congress,the Party Central Committee has attached great importance to strengthening basic research.In this context,basic research,as the source and general switch of scientific and technological innovation,is an important kernel for promoting China s scientific and technological progress.As China s investment in basic research continues to grow substantially,the government,as an investor,needs to understand whether the utility and value of its investment in basic research is maximized,as well as its impact and effect on scientific and technological development,social progress and economic growth.The National Natural Science Fund,as one of the important channels of funding for basic research in China,has grown rapidly over the past five years.In order to assess the financial support and management performance of the National Natural Science Fund,in 2011,the National Natural Science Fund Commission conducted an international evaluation of overall performance.Subsequently,the National Natural Science Fund began the annual performance evaluation,gradually evaluating the various types of projects.So far,18 project types have been fully covered.However,in view of the current state of research in China,the performance evaluation indicators of existing national natural science funds or the corresponding evaluation methods are focused on short and medium-term outputs and benefits,which are not consistent with the needs of long-term evaluations required for basic research programmes.Therefore,this paper makes a comprehensive and systematic assessment of the impact of the National Natural Science Fund on long-cycle,academic and non-academic research,which can help to comprehensively summarize the broad economic and social impact of the Fund and propose more effective ways of funding.Based on the theory of change and causal chain analysis,this paper firstly defines the concepts of impact and impact assessment of basic research programs,and divides the causal chain of the impact of basic research programs
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.141.202.216