两岸相互认可法院民事裁判实务的非均衡性研究  

On the Non-equilibrium of Mutual Recognition of Civil Judgments by Courts Across the Taiwan Straits

作　　者：薛永慧[1,2] XUE Yonghui

机构地区：[1]厦门大学台湾研究中心,福建厦门361005 [2]厦门大学台湾研究院,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《台湾研究集刊》2024年第1期59-78,共20页Taiwan Research Journal

基　　金：研究阐释党的十九届六中全会精神国家社科基金重大项目(22ZDA125)。

摘　　要：在对两岸相互认可法院民事裁判的司法实务,包括两岸相互认可法院裁判的基本情况、申请认可的裁判文书种类、法院裁判结果及裁判理由等进行系统考察后可以发现,两岸相互认可法院裁判实务呈现较法律规定更明显的非均衡性:内地人民法院展现了较法律规定更为宽松和开放的态度;台湾地区法院对于法律规定模糊、存有较大裁量空间的事项,采取或限缩或扩张解释,对认可人民法院裁判秉持严格和保守立场。非均衡性的根本成因在于两岸互信失衡和目标相异,台湾地区司法人员立场纠偏和内地司法品质持续提升是可能的矫正路径。A systematic examination of the judicial practice of mutual recognition of civil judgments across the Straits,including the basic situation of mutual recognition,types of judgment documents applied for recognition,court judgment results,and reasons for judgments,reveals a more pronounced non-equilibrium in the practical application than in legal provisions.The Chinese mainland courts show a more lenient and open attitude than what the law stipulates,whereas the judicial practice in Taiwan region takes a strict and conservative stance towards recognizing judgments of the mainland courts in matters where the legal provisions are ambiguous and there is greater room for discretion.The fundamental cause of the non-equilibrium lies in the imbalance of mutual trust and difference of goals between the two sides.Possible corrective paths include rectifying the stance of judicial personnel in Taiwan region and continuously improving judicial quality in the mainland.

关 键 词：两岸 民事裁判认可 司法实务 非均衡性 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]