论法律援助中的有效辩护——基于法律援助与委托辩护的对比性分析  

On Effective Defense in Legal Aid:A Comparative Analysis with Entrusted Defense

作　　者：程衍 CHENG Yan(School of Criminal Justice,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学刑事法学院,上海200042

出　　处：《南京师大学报（社会科学版）》2024年第1期123-134,共12页Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目“有效帮助指引下我国值班律师制度的运行困境与完善”(21CFX074)的研究成果。

摘　　要：法律援助与委托辩护在发生基础与价值导向上存在根本差异,因此有效辩护的侧重及实现亦有所不同,应分别探讨。委托辩护以民事合同为基础,以利益为导向,其中有效辩护的界定应是“令委托人满意的辩护”,在信息公开的条件下依靠市场自发调节可以实现。法律援助是以政府指派为基础,以义务为导向,其中的有效辩护应界定为“尽职尽责的辩护”,实现路径需依靠政府的有效监管,并对法律援助相关制度予以进一步的完善。There are fundamental differences between legal aid and entrusted defense in terms of occurrence basis and value orientation.Therefore,the emphasis and realization of effective defense are also different,which should be studied separately.Entrusted defense is based on contract and guided by interests.The definition of effective defense should be“the defense that satisfies the client”,which can be achieved under regulation of the market with the condition of open information.Legal aid is based on government assignment and guided by obligation.Therefore,the effective defense should be“due diligence defense”.The way to realize effective defense depends on the effective supervision of the government and the further improvement of the legal aid system.

关 键 词：法律援助 有效辩护 值班律师 公设辩护人 有效帮助 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学] D926.5[政治法律—法学]