祛魅与存真——人工智能时代的艺术存在方式探析  

Disenchantment and the Preservation of Authenticity:Discussion on the Existence of Art in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

作　　者：高迎刚[1,2] 李成蹊 Gao Yinggang;Li Chengxi(the Fine Arts School,Shandong University,Jinan,Shandong,250100;the Research Centre of Public Culture,Shandong University)

机构地区：[1]山东大学艺术学院,山东济南250100 [2]山东大学公共文化研究中心

出　　处：《民族艺术研究》2024年第1期93-101,共9页Ethnic Art Studies

基　　金：山东省社会科学规划研究重点项目“中国式现代化背景中艺术批评范式演变研究”(项目批准号:22BWYJ01)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：伴随着人工智能技术的快速更新迭代,艺术的存在方式也重新引起了人们的关注。人工智能时代的艺术存在方式,其最核心的内容依然是亘古常新的艺术与技术之间的关系问题。如果说19世纪以来摄影与录像、扫描与复制等技术的不断进步,已经促使人们对传统艺术的存在方式产生了越来越深的怀疑;那么20世纪中后期以来逐渐发展起来的数字技术、网络技术以及方兴未艾的人工智能技术,则彻底颠覆了人们对传统艺术存在方式的认知。伴随着技术性因素的不断发展,艺术的本质属性也在“祛魅”与“存真”的变迁与坚持中愈发清晰。未来的人工智能技术能否具备艺术创意的能力,已经不是技术本身的问题。艺术之为艺术,归根结底并不取决于技术性因素的变迁。Along with the rapid updating of artificial intelligence technology,the existence of art has attracted people's attention.The core content of the existence of art in the age of artificial intelligence is still the age-old question of the relationship between art and technology.If it is said that,since the 19th century,the continuous progress of photography and video,scanning and copying technology have prompted people to have deeper doubts about the traditional way of the existence of art,then,since the mid to the late 20th century,the gradual development of digital technology,network technology,as well as the booming technology of artificial intelligence have completely subverted people's cognition of the traditional way of the existence of art.Along with the continuous development of technical factors,the essential attributes of art have become clearer in the change and persistence of“disenchantment”and“preservation of authenticity”.Whether future artificial intelligence technology can have the ability to create art is no longer a question of technology itself.The fact that art is art does not depend on the change of technical factors.

关 键 词：人工智能 艺术 存在方式 祛魅 存真 

分 类 号：J0-05[艺术—艺术理论]