传统性修复和吸附性修复全口义齿的效果比较  

Comparison of the effects of traditional and adsorption restorative full dentures

作　　者：王冬霞[1] 赵嘉珩[1] 王丹[1] 周大凤 刘昭睿 WANG Dongxia;ZHAO Jiaheng;WANG Dan;ZHOU Dafeng;LIU Zhaorui(Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Jiamusi University,Jiamusi 154002,China)

机构地区：[1]佳木斯大学附属口腔医院,黑龙江佳木斯154002

出　　处：《黑龙江医药科学》2024年第1期194-196,共3页Heilongjiang Medicine and Pharmacy

摘　　要：目的:比较传统义齿和吸附性义齿哪种修复效果更好,找到合适的修复方式。方法:选取2022年1月至2023年1月佳木斯大学附属口腔医院收治的50例无牙颌牙槽骨吸收呈Ⅲ-Ⅳ的患者,随机采用传统修复方式和吸附性义齿修复方式,通过问卷调查数据论证。结果:3个月和半年后,对20例传统修复方式和30例吸附性义齿修复方式患者的适应性调查(包括颌位关系、固位、疼痛点、咀嚼效率、发音、美观),吸附性义齿适应性显著提高,存在统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:吸附性义齿修复方式的疗效较传统性修复好,值得推广。Objective:To contrast traditional dentures with adsorbed dentures,which is the more appropriate restoration method.Method:Select 50 patients with edentulous alveolar bone resorption of III-IV from January 2022 to January 2023,and randomly use traditional restoration methods and adsorption denture restoration methods.Use questionnaire survey data to demonstrate this.Result:After three months and six months,a adaptability survey was conducted on 20 patients with traditional restoration methods and 30 patients with adsorption denture restoration methods,including jaw position relationship,fixation,pain points,chewing efficiency,pronunciation,and aesthetics.The adaptability of adsorption dentures was significantly improved,with statistical differences(P<0.05).Conclusion:The therapeutic effect of adsorption denture repair is good and worthy of promotion.

关 键 词：传统义齿 吸附性义齿 适应性 有效率 

分 类 号：R783.6[医药卫生—口腔医学]