3种主流现代解剖学本体的器官表征特点对比分析研究  

A Comparative Study on the Organ Representation Characteristics of Three Mainstream Anatomical Ontologies

作　　者：付璐 姚克宇 杨啸林[3] 朱彦[2] FU Lu;YAO Keyu;YANG Xiaolin;ZHU Yan(Institute of Chinese Medical History and Literature,China Academy of Chinese Medical Science,Beijing 100700,China;Institute of Informational Traditional Chinese Medicine,China Academy of Chinese Medical Science,Beijing 100700,China;Institute of Basic Medical Sciences,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences&Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100005,China)

机构地区：[1]中国中医科学院中国医史文献研究所,北京100700 [2]中国中医科学院中医药信息研究所,北京100700 [3]中国医学科学院/北京协和医学院基础医学研究所,北京100005

出　　处：《医学信息学杂志》2024年第2期59-64,共6页Journal of Medical Informatics

基　　金：中国中医科学院科技创新工程项目(项目编号:CI2021A05306);中国医学科学院医学与健康科技创新工程项目(项目编号:2021-I2M-1-057);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金资助(项目编号:ZZ13-YQ-126)。

摘　　要：目的/意义分析解剖学本体的器官表征特点,为其他领域本体的研究和构建提供参考。方法/过程对比医学系统命名法——临床术语标准(SCT)、跨物种解剖本体Uberon、解剖学基础模型本体(FMA)3种解剖学本体在器官分类方法、术语映射等方面的异同。结果/结论 SCT与Uberon主要依据器官功能分类,FMA主要依据器官解剖形态分类;FMA和Uberon中器官的概念与SCT中整体器官的概念相同,三者成对器官的表征形式较相近。Purpose/Significance To analyze the characteristics of organ representation of anatomical ontologies,and to provide references for the research and construction of ontology in other fields.Method/Process The similarities and differences of three mainstream anatomical ontologies of SNOMED CT(SCT),Uberon and the foundational model of anatomy ontology(FMA)in terms of organ classification methods and term mapping are compared.Result/Conclusion Among the three main types of anatomical ontologies,SCT and Uberon are mainly classified according to the function of organs,while FMA is mainly classified according to the anatomical morphology of organs.The concept of organs in FMA and Uberon is the same as the concept of entire organs in SCT,and the representation forms of paired organs in SCT,Uberon and FMA are similar.

关 键 词：医学系统命名法——临床术语标准 跨物种解剖本体 解剖学基础模型本体 器官表征 

分 类 号：R-058[医药卫生]