行政诉讼证据规则的适用性——基于三起行政诉讼案件的分析  

The Applicability of Evidence Rules in Administrative Litigation——Based on the Analysis of Three Administrative Litigation Cases

作　　者：黄炜乘 Huang Weicheng(Macao University of Science and Technology,Macao 999078,china)

机构地区：[1]澳门科技大学,中国澳门999078

出　　处：《西部学刊》2024年第6期63-66,共4页Journal of Western

摘　　要：行政诉讼中的证据规则是行政诉讼中对于可以证明为行政诉讼的事实状态的全部事实内容的基本准则,在具体司法实践中有严格要求,但对于具体条文的理解较为宽泛。结合对交通行政处罚、产品商标权、土地信息资料登记三个具体行政诉讼涉诉案例分析,对行政诉讼中作证规则、质证规则、认证规则三个重要规则进行阐述,进一步说明证据提供规则是质证和认证的基础,调取证据是解决当事人举证困难的救济方式,作证和质证是法庭对证据认定的重要环节,认证规则则是对案件事实和证明效力的认定。The rules of evidence in administrative litigation are the basic guidelines for factual content that can be proven as the factual state of administrative litigation in administrative litigation,and they have strict requirements in specific judicial practice,but the understanding of the specific provisions is relatively broad.This article combines the analysis of three specific administrative litigation cases including traffic administrative penalties,product trademark rights and land information registration to elaborate on the three important rules of testimony,cross-examination and authentication in administrative litigation,then it clarifies:the rule of evidence is the basis for cross-examination and authentication;access to evidence is a remedy for the parties’difficulties in adducing evidence;testimony and cross-examination are important link in the court’s determination of evidence;the rule of authentication is the determination of the facts of the case and the validity of the probative effect.

关 键 词：行政诉讼 证据规则 案例 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]