MDT-CBL教学方法在血液肿瘤临床教学中的应用研究  

Application Research of MDT-CBL Teaching Method in Clinical Education on Hematologic Tumors

作　　者：曹翊雄[1] 李君君[1] 龙星星 罗聪 Cao Yixiong;Li Junjun;Long Xingxing;Luo Cong(First Affiliated Hospital,Nanhua University,Hengyang,Hunan 421001,China)

机构地区：[1]南华大学附属第一医院,湖南衡阳421001

出　　处：《中国高等医学教育》2024年第1期111-113,共3页China Higher Medical Education

基　　金：南华大学校级教学改革研究项目(2021YB-XJG78)。

摘　　要：目的:探讨血液肿瘤教学中联合应用MDT和CBL教学方法的教学效果。方法:将2020年5月至2021年2月在血液科轮科的住院医师规范化培训学员共43人随机分为试验组(23人)和对照组(20人),试验组采用MDT-CBL教学方法,对照组采用LBL教学法,通过比较出科考核成绩和对带教老师的问卷调查比较两组的教学效果。结果:试验组学员在临床病例分析、实践技能及出科考核总成绩均优于对照组学员(P<0.05)。问卷调查表明,试验组学员在学习积极性、知识掌握程度、文献查阅能力、理论联系实际能力、临床思维能力、团队协作方面优于对照组学员(P<0.05)。结论:MDT-CBL教学方法能有效提高血液肿瘤的临床教学效果,全面提高学员的综合能力。Objective:To explore the teaching effectiveness of the combined application of MDT and CBL teaching methods in hematologic tumor education.Methods:From May 2020 to February 2021,43 standardized training participants in the Hematology Department were randomly divided into an experimental group(23 participants)and a control group(20 participants).The experimental group used the MDT-CBL teaching method,while the control group used the LBL teaching method.The teaching effectiveness of the two groups was compared through final assessments and questionnaire surveys of teaching faculty.Results:The experimental group outperformed the control group in overall scores for clinical case analysis,practical skills,and final assessments(P<0.05).The questionnaire survey indicated that the experimental group participants surpassed the control group in terms of learning enthusiasm,knowledge mastery,literature review ability,practical application of theoretical knowledge,clinical thinking ability,and teamwork skills(P<O.05).Conclusion:The MDT-CBL teaching method effectively enhances the clinical education on hematologic tumors,comprehensively improving the participants'overall capabilities.

关 键 词：多学科专家组协作诊疗 案例教学法 讲授教学法 血液肿瘤 

分 类 号：G642.4[文化科学—高等教育学]