检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李才源 LI Cai-yuan(School of Education and Psychology,Minnan Normal University,Zhangzhou 363000,Fujian,China)
机构地区:[1]闽南师范大学教育与心理学院,福建漳州363000
出 处:《兵团教育学院学报》2024年第2期32-38,66,共8页Journal of Bingtuan Education Institute
摘 要:[目的]探讨家庭经济地位对亲环境行为的影响,并检验稀缺心态和未来取向的中介作用。[方法]采用家庭经济地位问卷、亲环境行为问卷、稀缺心态问卷、未来取向问卷对473名大学生进行调查。[结果](1)家庭经济地位对亲环境行为有显著的预测作用,(B=0.09,t=2.17,p<0.05);(2)稀缺心态和未来取向不仅在家庭经济地位和亲环境行为之间分别起独立中介作用,而且在两者中发挥链式中介作用,中介效应占总效应的61.54%。[结论]家庭经济地位不仅可以正向预测亲环境行为的发生,而且可以通过稀缺心态和未来取向间接影响亲环境行为。[Purposes]To explore the effect of family socioeconomic status on pro-environmental behavior,and to test the mediating role of scarcity mindset and future orientation.[Methods]The survey was conducted on 473 college students using the family socioeconomic status,pro-environmental behavior,scarcity mindset,and future orientation questionnaire.[Results](1)Family socioeconomic status has a significant predictive effect on pro-environmental behavior(B=0.09,t=2.17,p<0.05);(2)Scarcity mindset and future orientation not only play an independent mediating role between family socioeconomic status and pro-environmental behavior,but also play a chain mediating role between the two,with the mediating effect accounting for 61.54%of the total effect.[Conclusions]Family socioeconomic status can not only positively predict the occurrence of pro-environmental behavior,but also indirectly influence pro-environmental behavior through scarcity mindset and future orientation.
分 类 号:B844.2[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.71.235