“日本科举学”的思想射程与话语批评  

The Ideological Range and Discourse Criticism of"Japanese Imperial Examination Studies"

作　　者：吴光辉[1] 陈晓隽 WU Guanghui;CHEN Xiaojun(College of Foreign Languages and Cultures,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005,China;School of Foreign Languages,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou 350108,China)

机构地区：[1]厦门大学外文学院,福建厦门3610051 [2]福州大学外国语学院,福建福州350108

出　　处：《杭州师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第6期85-93,133,共10页Journal of Hangzhou Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：中国的科举制度随着唐朝律令在日本的施行而传播到“岛国”日本,逐渐形成了极为独特的“日本科举学”。“日本科举学”不仅融入平安时代以来的以律令与文学为核心的选才制度、以儒学典籍为内容的考试制度、明治初期以招募人才为目的的议会提案,而且进入到战后日本的科举研究之中。日本在接受与把握科举制度的过程中,也将众多的学问融汇在一起,构筑起跨领域、多学科的思想射程,更在一个世界场域、东亚考察、中国视角的框架下构筑起以科举制度为核心的话语批评,贯穿了日本主体性的身份转换与文化认同。正是这样的承传与冲突、曲折与反复,令“日本科举学”的历史建构跌宕起伏、回味无穷。China's imperial examination system spread to the"island nation"of Japan with the implementation of the laws of the Tang Dynasty in Japan,eventually resulting in the formation of a unique"Japanese imperial examination studies".The studies were not only integrated into the talent selection system based on laws and literature starting in the Heian era,the examination system based on Confucian classics,and the parliamentary proposal for recruiting talents in the early Meiji Period,they also entered the research of imperial examinations in post-war Japan.In the process of accepting and grasping the imperial examination system,Japan has also integrated a broad range of knowledge to build a cross-disciplinary and muli-disciplinary range of ideas.It has also built a world field,East Asian survey,and the framework of China's perspectives.Discourse criticism with the imperial examination system as the core runs through the identity transformation and cultural identity of Japan's subjectivity.It is this kind of inheritance and conflict,twists and turns,that endows the historical construction of"Japanese imperial examinations studies"with rich connotations.

关 键 词：科举制 日本科举学 思想射程 东亚文化共同体 

分 类 号：B313[哲学宗教—外国哲学] D731.3[政治法律—政治学]