走出现代性道德的困境——马克思主义与新亚里士多德主义、后现代主义伦理学的跨时空对话  

Getting out of the Dilemma of Modernity Morality——A Cross Time and Space Dialogue Between Marxism,Neo Aristotelianism,and Postmodern Ethics

作　　者：黄学胜 常子龙 HUANG Xuesheng;CHANG Zilong(School of Marxism,Sun Yat-sen Univesity,Guangzhou 510275,China;School of Humanities,Nanchang University,Nanchang 330031,China)

机构地区：[1]中山大学马克思主义学院,广东广州510275 [2]南昌大学人文学院,江西南昌330031

出　　处：《齐鲁学刊》2024年第2期48-61,共14页Qilu Journal

基　　金：广东省哲学社会科学规划一般项目“《资本论》及其手稿的伦理思想研究”(GD24CMK12);江西省社会科学基金专项“大学生文化自信培育的马克思主义哲学基础研究”(SZ212014)。

摘　　要：在马克思主义与以麦金泰尔为代表的新亚里士多德主义和以利奥塔、鲍曼等人为代表的后现代主义伦理学之间展开思想对话,不仅可能,而且必要。在西方伦理思想史上,他们共同面对的都是现代性道德及其后果,但由于立场、对时代的判断和各自认可价值规范的不同,导致了三种不同且典型的伦理学应对方案。可从切入点、应对方案及性质和成效三个方面展开比较研究,这种比较有助于深化理解西方道德传统的近现代演化、各学派的路径及其可能局限,也能为探寻克服和应对现代性道德困境的可靠出路、激活马克思主义伦理学的当代意义、正确看待当前社会的伦理状况以及推动后续的马克思主义伦理学研究等问题提供有益启示。It is not only possible but also necessary to engage in an intellectual dialogue between Marxism and Neo Aristotelianism represented by Macintyre,as well as postmodern ethics represented by Leotard,Baumann,and others.In the history of Western ethical thought,they all faced modernity morality and its consequences together.However,due to differences in stance,judgment of the times,and recognition of value norms by various schools of thought,three different and typical ethical response plans emerged.Comparative research can be conducted from three aspects:entry points,response plans,nature and effectiveness.This comparison helps to deepen the understanding of the modern evolution of Western moral traditions,the paths of various schools of thought,and their possible limitations.It can also provide useful insights for exploring reliable ways to overcome and respond to modern moral dilemmas,activate the contemporary significance of Marxist ethics,provide valuable insights into the current ethical situation in our society and the subsequent research on some important issues of Marxist ethics and etc.

关 键 词：现代性道德 马克思主义 新亚里士多德主义 后现代主义伦理学 

分 类 号：A81[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学] B82