检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王月影 范保杰[1] 曹志敏[1] 王彦[1] 苏秋竹[1] 张志肖[1] 王珅 时会影 沈颖超 程须珍[3] 刘长友[1] 田静[1] Wang Yueying;Fan Baojie;Cao Zhimin;Wang Yan;Su Qiuzhu;Zhang Zhixiao;Wang Shen;Shi Huiying;Shen Yingchao;Cheng Xuzhen;Liu Changyou;Tian Jing(Institute of Food and Oil Crops,Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences/Hebei Laboratory of Crop Genetic Breeding,Shijiazhuang 050031,Hebei,China;China National Rice Research Institute,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology,Hangzhou 310006,Zhejiang,China;Institute of Crop Sciences,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Beijing 100081,China)
机构地区:[1]河北省农林科学院粮油作物研究所/河北省作物遗传育种实验室,河北石家庄050031 [2]中国农业科学院中国水稻研究所/水稻生物学国家重点实验室,浙江杭州310006 [3]中国农业科学院作物科学研究所,北京100081
出 处:《作物杂志》2024年第1期73-79,共7页Crops
基 金:国家重点研发计划(2019YFD1000700,2019YFD1000702);国家现代农业产业技术体系(CARS-08-G03);河北省青年拔尖人才(2018);河北省重点研发计划(19226353D);河北省现代农业产业技术体系(HBCT2018070203);河北省农林科学院创新工程项目(2022KJCXZX-LYS-17)。
摘 要:利用覆盖绿豆11条染色体的16个EST-SSR标记,对来自我国15个不同省市的156份绿豆农家种和53份育成品种进行遗传多样性分析。结果表明,16个标记总共检测出57个等位变异位点,平均等位变异数3.56,有效等位变异数(Ne)1.89,Shannon信息指数(PIC)0.70。与育成品种相比,绿豆农家种的观测等位变异数、Ne、期望杂合度和PIC较高,表明农家种的遗传多样性高于育成品种。Structure分析可以将所有材料分为3个组群,组群内资源有按地理来源聚集的趋势,3个组群内种质间的平均遗传距离相差不大。利用UPGMA法进行聚类分析,可将所有参试绿豆材料分为A、B、C三大类群,类群A集中了大部分育成品种,类群B和C则以农家种为主。12个不同地理来源资源群体的遗传一致度介于0.4706~0.9627。We used 16 EST-SSR markers covering 11 chromosomes of mung bean genome to analyze the genetic diversity of 156 mung bean landraces and 53 improved mung bean varieties from 15 different provinces in China.The results showed that 16 EST-SSR markers detected a total of 57 alleles,with an average of 3.56 alleles per marker,and the average effective alleles number(N e)was 1.89,the Shannonʼs information index(PIC)was 0.70.Compared with the improved mung bean varieties,the observed allele number,N e,the expected heterozygosity and PIC of the landraces were higher,indicating that the genetic diversity of landraces was higher than that of the improved mung bean varieties.The Structure analysis divided all resources into three distinct groups.The resources in the group tend to gather according to geographical origin,and the average genetic distance between germplasms in the three groups had little difference.Using UPGMA method for cluster analysis,all the mung bean resources could be divided into group A,B and C.Group A concentrated most improved mung bean varieties,while group B and C were mainly landraces.The genetic consistency of 12 populations from different geographical sources ranged from 0.4706 to 0.9627.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15