艺术的何是与何为——阿多诺艺术思想论说  

What Art Is and What Art Is For——A Comment on Adorno’s Definition of Art Thinking

作　　者：刘秀哲 LIU Xiuzhe(School of Literature,Heilongjiang University,Harbin 150080,China)

机构地区：[1]黑龙江大学文学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150080

出　　处：《浙江海洋大学学报（人文科学版）》2024年第1期69-74,共6页Journal of Zhejiang Ocean University(Humanities Sciences)

摘　　要：关于何为艺术以及艺术何为的问题学界历来存有争议。阿多诺敏锐地捕捉到这一问题的关键所在,并对历史上艺术的定义予以辩证的审视,进而用模仿、焰火、幻象、精神等来指称艺术,以此表明艺术定义的多义性与含混性。以此为逻辑起点,阿多诺对艺术的本质进行了深入的探寻,否定了历史上的“本质主义”,强调了艺术本质的非确定性,明确了艺术所应承担的主体责任。虽然阿多诺对艺术本质的探寻仍旧存在诸多争议,但其关于“反艺术”的论述,实质上为艺术的发展提供了一种可能。In the academic world,the question on what art is and what art is for has always been controversial,which has not yet been effectively resolved even to this day.Adorno keenly captured the crux of this issue and examines the historical definition of art in a dialectical manner,and then nominated art in terms of mimicry,pyrotechnics,illusion,spirit,etc.,thus demonstrating the multiplicity and ambiguity of the definition of art.Taking this as a logical starting point,Adorno makes an in-depth search for the essence of art,denies the historical“essentialism”,emphasizes the non-determinism of the essence of art,and clarifies the subjective responsibility that art should assume.Although Adorno’s search for the essence of art is still controversial,and the question of what art is and what art is for is still open to further debate,Adorno’s discussion about“anti-art”provides a possibility,in essence,for the development of art,which should be valued by us.

关 键 词：阿多诺 反艺术 艺术本质 主体责任 

分 类 号：I01[文学—文学理论]