龙山文化白陶产地的初步研究——以两城镇等遗址白陶样品为例  

Preliminary Study of the Source of Longshan Culture White Pottery:A Case Study of White Pottery from Liangchengzhen and Other Sites

作　　者：郭明建 文德安 栾丰实[3] 朱铁权[4] 伊莎贝尔·德鲁克 万嘉丽 陆青玉 孙波 梁中合[8] Guo Mingjian;Anne P.Underhill;Isabelle C.Druc

机构地区：[1]暨南大学历史学系,广州市510632 [2]耶鲁大学人类学系,美国纽黑文市06520 [3]山东大学历史文化学院,济南市250100 [4]中山大学社会学与人类学学院,广州市510275 [5]威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校人类学系,美国麦迪逊市53706 [6]义乌市博物馆,浙江省金华市322000 [7]山东省文物考古研究院,济南市250012 [8]中国社会科学院考古研究所,北京市100101

出　　处：《考古》2024年第2期89-106,F0002,共19页Archaeology

基　　金：鲁斯基金(Luce/ACLS)(2010)的支持。

摘　　要：利用岩相及主量和微量化学元素分析,对城子崖、丁公与两城镇、尧王城等两组龙山文化遗址发现的白陶样品进行检测和对比,证明这些白陶样品原料大多为本地获得。但城子崖遗址相对较容易获取优质陶土,两城镇遗址的白陶来源则呈现出多元化,部分优质白陶器应来自西部的城子崖、丁公等遗址。Using petrographic analysis and major and trace element analysis,systematic examination and comparison were conducted on white pottery samples unearthed from four large Longshan culture sites in the western part of the Haidai region,namely Chengziya,Dinggong,and Liangchengzhen and Yaowangcheng to the east.Through this analysis,in addition to geological background surveys and research,this study reveals that most raw materials for white pottery samples from the eastern and western groups of sites in the Haidai region were probably locally obtained.While high-quality clay was more easily accessible at the Chengziya and Dinggong sites,white pottery from the Liangchengzhen and Yaowangcheng sites showed a diversity of sources,with some high-quality white pottery likely imported from more distant regions to the west.This indirectly reflects the existence of wider social networks and even stronger political and military power within political groups associated with these two sites.

关 键 词：龙山文化 白陶产地 岩相分析 化学元素 地质背景 

分 类 号：K878[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学]