检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马丽娅 MA Liya(School of Law and Politics,Zhejiang Sci-Tech University,Hangzhou,Zhejiang 310000,China)
出 处:《河北开放大学学报》2024年第2期51-53,共3页Journal of Hebei Open University
摘 要:《儿童权利公约》作为国际人权条约体系的重要组成部分,明确了儿童这一独特群体的权利主体地位,我国自加入《公约》之后,将《公约》“国内法化”为以《未成年人保护法》为主的一系列未成年人保护法律。然而我国在《未成年人保护法》中体现的儿童主体地位与《公约》之间却存在着一定的差距,儿童更多地成为被保护的对象,而非权利主体。通过对《公约》原则的适用分析差异存在的原因,才能更好地改善并缩小和《公约》的差距,保护儿童的权利主体地位。As an important part of the human rights treaty system,The Convention on the Rights of the Child defines the status of the rights of children.Since China joined The Convention,The Convention has been“transformed into domestic law”into a series of minor protection laws,mainly The Law on the Protection of Minors.However,there is a gap between the status of children embodied in The Law on the Protection of Minors and The Convention,Children have become more protected objects than subjects of rights.By analyzing the reasons for the differences in the application of the principles of The Convention,we can better improve and narrow the gap with The Convention and protect children’s rights.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15