检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:牛世琦 邓蕊[1] NIU Shiqi;DENG Rui(College of Humanities and Social Sciences,Shanxi Medical University,Taiyuan 030001,China)
机构地区:[1]山西医科大学人文社会科学学院,山西太原030001
出 处:《医学与哲学》2024年第7期42-46,共5页Medicine and Philosophy
基 金:2023年山西省科技战略研究专项项目。
摘 要:结合尸体肝移植受体会议审查和通讯审查两种审查形式的基本流程,通过对在两种审查形式实践过程中发现的案例进行陈述、分析,发现两种形式分别存在知情同意的“缺位”、公正性的“离场”两个主要伦理问题,并尝试提出可行性建议,包括知情同意相关情况需重点汇报、邀请伦理专家直接参与知情同意过程、通讯审查变快为“慢”,以期进一步推动完善尸体肝移植伦理审查相关工作,使其能够更好地实现保障受体权益的目标。By combining the basic processes of conference review and correspondence review for cadaveric liver transplantation receptors,this paper presents and analyzes cases discovered during the practice of these two review forms.It identifies two main ethical issues in each form,namely the"absence"of informed consent and the"departure"of impartiality,and attempts to provide feasible suggestions.These suggestions include focusing on the reporting on informed consent-related situations,inviting ethics experts to directly participate in the informed consent process,and transforming correspondence review from fast to"slow",in order to further promote and improve the work related to the ethical review of cadaveric liver transplantation,enabling it to better achieve the goal of protecting the rights and interests of receptors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249