科南特“非升即走”制度的历史审视和现实反思  

Historical Review and Realistic Reflection on the"Up-or-out"System of Conant

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:胡莎莉 邱艳萍[1] 蔡玲玲 Hu Shali;Qiu Yanping;Cai Lingling(Baoji University of Arts and Sciences,Baoji,Shanxi,721013,China)

机构地区:[1]宝鸡文理学院,陕西宝鸡721013

出  处:《教育科学探索》2024年第2期106-112,共7页THE SCIENTIFIC EXPLORATION OF EDUCATION

基  金:全国教育科学“十三五”规划2020年度教育部重点项目“西部地方高校初任教师教学胜任力评价及提升研究”(编号:DIA200358)的研究成果。

摘  要:高校教师的聘任与考核一直是世界各国关注的焦点话题,哈佛大学科南特校长任职期间所提出的“非升即走”制度成为全世界效仿的范本,通过对科南特“非升即走”制度生成机理、运行规则、基本特征、实施效果这几个方面的历史审视,对我国一流研究型大学的建设进行现实反思,并提出改善我国建设研究型大学现状的意见,诸如:“甄选移植土壤”:支持学术自由;“破五唯立多维”:调整聘任机制;“扶上马送一程”:建立保障机制,以便为我国建设一流研究型大学提供思路。The appointment and assessment of university teachers has always been the focus of attention of all countries in the world,and the"up-or-out"system proposed by President Conant of Harvard University during his tenure has become a model for the world to follow,through the historical review of the generation mechanism,operation rules,basic characteristics and implementation effects of the"up-or-out"system of Conant,the construction of China's first-class research universities is realistically reflected,and suggestions are put forward to improve the status quo of China's construction of research universities,such as selection the transplantation soil to support academic freedom,breaking the five dimensions for independence,adjusting the appointment mechanism,helping get on horse and escort distance,establishing a guarantee mechanism to provide ideas for China to build first-class research universities.

关 键 词:哈佛大学 “非升即走” 考核标准 

分 类 号:G649.1[文化科学—高等教育学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象