机构地区:[1]北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院材料研究室,国家口腔医学中心,国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,口腔生物材料和数字诊疗装备国家工程研究中心,北京大学口腔医学院口腔医疗器械检验中心,国家药品监督管理局口腔材料重点实验室,口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室,口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室,北京100081
出 处:《北京大学学报(医学版)》2024年第2期345-351,共7页Journal of Peking University:Health Sciences
基 金:科技部“十三五”国家重点研发计划(2018YFB1106905)。
摘 要:目的:分析成型方向对打印件的表面特征、弹性模量、挠曲强度及断裂韧性的影响及其与受力方向之间的关系,为口腔义齿基托树脂材料的临床应用提供科学依据和指导。方法:采用3D打印技术使用义齿基托树脂材料打印义齿基托树脂试样,试样形状及尺寸参考目前常规义齿基托材料检测标准。检测物理性能的试样为圆柱体(直径15 mm、厚1 mm),在Z轴的不同角度方向上(0°、45°、90°)进行打印。扫描电镜观察经不同方向打印后试样的表面微观形貌;试样经色稳定仪浸水光照后观察其颜色稳定性;利用粗糙度仪分析试样表面粗糙程度;用维氏硬度计测量硬度。检测力学性能的试样为长方体(检测弹性模量和挠曲强度:长64 mm、宽10 mm、高3.3 mm;检测断裂韧性:长39 mm、高8.0 mm、宽4.0 mm),分为W、H两组,W组以长×宽为底面,平行X、Y轴平面,自下而上沿Z轴开始打印,H组以长×高为底面,平行X、Y轴平面,自下而上沿Z轴开始打印,两组成型角度均分为0°、45°和90°,通过万能力学试验机研究其弹性模量、挠曲强度和断裂韧性。采用SPSS 22.0软件对数据进行统计分析。结果:表面形貌和粗糙度与成型方向密切相关,0°、45°及90°试样之间差异具有统计学意义,0°试样表面最光滑(粗糙度<1μm),45°试样表面最粗糙(粗糙度>3μm)。0°试样硬度最佳[(196.13±0.20)MPa],与90°试样[(186.62±4.81)MPa]比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试样的力学性能与打印方向也密切相关,W组45°试样的弹性模量、挠曲强度及断裂韧性与其他方向试样比较均为最高,差异具有统计学意义。弹性模量结果显示,H组中,45°试样弹性模量最高,与0°和90°试样比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);W组中0°及45°试样高于90°试样(P<0.05);且W组0°及45°试样的弹性模量均显著高于H组0°及45°试样(P<0.05)。挠曲强度结果显示,H组各角度试样之间差异无统Objective:To analyze the influence of forming direction on the surface characteristics,elastic modulus,bending strength and fracture toughness of printed parts and the relationship between forming direction and force direction,and to provide scientific basis and guidance for the clinical application of oral denture base resin materials.Methods:The 3D printing technology was used to print denture base resin samples.The shape and size of the samples referred to the current standard for testing conventional denture base materials.The samples used for physical performance testing were cylindrical(with a diameter of 15 mm and a thickness of 1 mm)and printed at different angles along the Z axis(0°,45°,90°).Scanning electron microscope was used to observe the microscopic topography of the different samples.The color stability of different samples was observed by color stabilizer.The surface roughness of the samples was analyzed by using surface roughness tester.The Vickers hardness was measured to analyze the hardness of the samples.The samples used for mechanical performance testing were rectangular(elastic modulus and bending strength:A length of 64 mm,a width of 10 mm,and a height of 3.3 mm;fracture toughness:A length of 39 mm,a width of 8 mm,and a height of 4 mm),divided into two groups:W group and H group.The W group was printed from the bottom up along the Z axis with the length×width as the bottom surface parallel to the X,Y axis plane,while the H group printed from the bottom up along the Z axis with the length×height as the bottom surface parallel to the X,Y axis plane.The forming angles of both groups were equally divided into 0°,45°,and 90°.The elastic modulus,bending strength and fracture toughness of different samples were studied through universal mechanical testing machine.SPSS 22.0 software was used for statistical analysis.Results:The microscopic topography and roughness of different samples were closely related to the printing direction,with significant differences between the 0°,45°,and 90°
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...