“绘事后素”注解考辨  

Critical analysis on the interpretation of"Huishi Hou Su"

作　　者：王莉 WANG Li(School of Fashion Media,Jiangxi Institute of Fashion Technology,Nanchang 330201,China)

机构地区：[1]江西服装学院时尚传媒学院,江西南昌330201

出　　处：《东华大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第1期79-86,共8页Journal of Donghua University:Social Science

基　　金：2019年度上海市教育委员会科研创新计划冷门绝学项目“中国传统服装染色研究与色彩复原”(项目编号:2019-01-07-00-04-E00070);2023年江西服装学院科研项目“中国传统服饰色彩中的白色文化流变”(项目编号:JF-LX-ZX-202203)。

摘　　要：“绘事后素”一词源自《论语》。古往今来,对“绘事后素”的解读,学者争议不断,其中以东汉郑玄的“后素”说和南宋朱熹的“先素”说最为典型。针对“绘事后素”注解之争,该文从对其解读影响较大的“绘事”、“素”、“后”及绘事工序入手进行深入辨析,探讨“绘事后素”注解之争的根源。通过辨析发现,当“绘事”意指服饰织物的一种局部装饰工艺时为“缋画”,当“绘事”意指独立的绘画艺术时为“绘画”;当“素”意指白采时,素色后施,当“素”意指粉地时,素色先施。最终得出结论,“绘事后素”注解之辩的实质不在于绘事本身“先素”“后素”的工序之争,而在于隐藏其后的孔子“礼”之思想。The term"Huishi Hou Su"originates from The Analects of Confucius.Throughout history,numerous scholars have continuously debated the interpretation of"Huishi Hou Su",with the"Apply the white color after color painting"theory proposed by Zheng Xuan of the Eastern Han Dynasty and the"Apply color painting on the plain silk"theory put forward by Zhu Xi of the Southern Song Dynasty being the most typical.In response to critical analysis on the interpretation of"Huishi Hou Su",this paper conducts an in-depth analysis by examining the influential factors of"Huishi","Su","Hou"and the procedure of painting,aiming to explore the root of critical analysis on the interpretation of"Huishi Hou Su".Through the analysis,it is found that when"Huishi"refers to a particular decorative craft of textiles,it should be translated as"painting on silk".When"Huishi"refers to independent painting art,it should be translated as"painting".When"Su"refers to the white pigment,it is applied after color painting,and when"Su"refers to the plain silk,it means the ground color.Ultimately,the conclusion is drawn that the essence of critical analysis on the interpretation of"Huishi Hou Su"lies not in the procedural dispute of color painting itself,but in the underlying Confucian"Ritual"ideology.

关 键 词：绘事后素 缋画 绘画 白采 粉地 

分 类 号：J523[艺术—艺术设计] J22