检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邵帅 李爱年[1] SHAO Shuai;LI Ainian(School of Law,Hunan Normal University,Changsha,Hunan 410081,China)
出 处:《闽江学院学报》2023年第6期20-27,共8页Journal of Minjiang University
基 金:洞庭湖生态环境法治保障研究(19ZDA159)。
摘 要:国际河流“准公共物品”的属性对清晰表述治理语境造成一定程度的障碍。为了准确描述国际河流的法律属性,“共有财产”成为一种可供选择的语境范式。由于该表述是根据法律名词、公共信托理论直接嵌套形成,因此存在边界模糊、权属不明、导向偏离等学理支撑不足的问题。同时,国家主权与共有产权混杂造成的“共赢”障碍,以及机制建构与利益平衡的差序造成的“共治”障碍,容易导致流域沿岸国合作治理体系分散。两个层面的语境适用障碍需要全新的思维加以改造,“共有财产”语境的重构可以从明确语境价值导向、推进语境概念化、增强可操作性三方面应用于包括国际河流治理在内的人类生态协作治理体系,并提供方法论指导。The absence of"quasi public goods"in international rivers has led to differences in clearly expressing the governance context.In order to accurately describe the legal nature of international rivers,the choice of"common property"has become an alternative context paradigm.However,the ecological governance has a dilemma of rigid theoretical basis,such as fuzzy boundary,unclear ownership and deviation of direction due to imposed the expression to the context.At the same time,the obstacle of win-win strategy caused by the mixture of national sovereignty and shared property rights,as well as the"co-governance"obstacle caused by the difference between mechanism construction and interest equity,lead to the disorder of the cooperative governance system of the basin and the coastal countries.The external and internal barriers indicates a new way of thinking as the core.The reconstruction can provide solutions for international river governance based on clarifying value orientation,promoting context conceptualization and enhancing operability.
分 类 号:D996.9[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.203.108