检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张哲琪 昌秦湘 ZHANG Zheqi;CHANG Qinxiang(Taiyuan University,Taiyuan 030032,China)
机构地区:[1]太原学院,山西太原030032
出 处:《安徽农学通报》2024年第7期113-117,共5页Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin
基 金:山西省教育厅教学改革创新项目(J20231436)。
摘 要:本项目通过厘清合作学习的本质特点,在全面梳理园林专业合作学习模式应用现状的基础上,研究分析园林专业实施合作学习的评价体系。运用AHP法构建合作学习评价模型,其中,准则层权重排序由高到低为B2小组评价(0.417 6)、B4学生自我评价(0.261 1)、B3组间互评(0.197 0)和B1教师评价(0.124 2)。小组评价、学生自我评价侧重实践课程的过程性评价,组间互评和教师评价为结果性评价。本研究目的在于进一步丰富教学组织和评价方法,为园林专业及类似专业的合作学习方法实践提供参考。This project aims to clarify the essential characteristics of collaborative learning,and based on a comprehensive review of the current application status of collaborative learning models in the field of landscape architecture,investigate an evaluation system for the implementation of collaborative learning in the field of landscape architecture.The AHP method was used to construct a collaborative learning evaluation model,the weight of criterion layer were ranked from high to low as B2 group evaluation(0.417 6),B4 student self-evaluation(0.261 1),B3 inter group mutual evaluation(0.197 0),and B1 teacher evaluation(0.124 2).Group evaluation and student self-evaluation focus on the process evaluation of practical courses,while inter group evaluation and teacher evaluation were outcome evaluations.The purpose of this study was further enrich the organization and evaluation methodsteaching,and to provide reference for the practice of collaborative learning methods in landscape architecture majors and similar majors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15