检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵富强[1] 祝含秋 陈耘[1] 陈文东 ZHAO Fuqiang;ZHU Hanqiu;CHEN Yun;CHEN Wendong(Wuhan University of Technology,Wuhan,China)
出 处:《管理学报》2024年第1期66-76,共11页Chinese Journal of Management
基 金:国家社会科学基金资助项目(23FGLB069,21FGLB027,20FGLB047)。
摘 要:根据角色理论与个人-工作匹配框架,并基于知识密集型企业员工有效样本多时点问卷数据的实证分析,探究个体多团队成员身份通过角色整合和工作繁荣(积极路径)以及角色冲突和工作疏离(消极路径)对个体创新绩效的整合影响,同时,考察认知灵活性在其间的边界条件作用。研究结果表明:个体多团队成员身份既通过角色整合与工作繁荣对个体创新绩效有显著正向间接作用,又通过角色冲突与工作疏离对个体创新绩效有显著负向间接作用;对于高认知灵活性的员工而言,多团队成员身份通过角色整合和工作繁荣对个体创新绩效的积极影响更强;对于低认知灵活性的员工而言,多团队成员身份通过角色冲突和工作疏离对个体创新绩效的消极影响更强。Based on the role theory and person-job fit framework,as well as the empirical analysis of the multi-wave data from 256 employees in knowledge-intensive firms,we explored the integrative effects of multiple team membership on individual innovation performance and examined the moderating role of cognitive flexibility.The research results suggest that multiple team membership on the one hand has a positive indirect effect on individual innovation performance through role integration and thriving at work.On the other hand,it has a negative indirect effect on individual innovation performance through role conflict and alienation at work;for employees with high cognitive flexibility,multiple team membership has a stronger positive impact on individual innovation performance through role integration and thriving at work;for employees with low cognitive flexibility,multiple team membership has a stronger negative impact on individual innovation performance through role conflict and alienation at work.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222