司法证明科学化与人民陪审实质化——推进“以审判为中心”的技术主义路径  

Scientization of judicial proof and substantialization of people's assessor system——Promoting the technical path to"trial-centralization"reform

作　　者：周梓睿 Zhou Zirui(China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing,100088)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学证据科学研究院、司法文明协同创新中心,北京100088

出　　处：《证据科学》2024年第1期70-82,共13页Evidence Science

摘　　要：深化人民陪审员制度是推进“以审判为中心”刑事诉讼制度改革的可行路径之一,但“以审判为中心”与人民陪审员制度两大改革面临“循环困境”。在司法证明的视角下,可以通过司法证明科学化路径推动人民陪审员制度的实际应用,进而将这一技术主义方案作为“以审判为中心”制度改革的着力点。司法证明科学化的引入于我国司法实践具备必要性与可行性,从限缩范围的精准适用、构建两种诉讼格局下的多元司法证明方法以及明确司法证明科学化的程序规范三方面入手,即可建立以司法证明方法为核心的技术主义改革路径。The development of the people's assessor system offers a viable path to the promotion of the“trial-centralization”reform.However,both the trial-centralization reform and the people's assessor system reform are confronted with a circular argument dilemma.From the perspective of judicial proof,the path to scientific judicial proof,which is a technical approach,can be used not only to enhance the practical implementation of the people's assessor system,but also as a focal point in the“trial-centralization”reform.In China,it is necessary and feasible to implement scientific judicial proof in the judidcial practice.A technical path to reform,the focus of which is the method of judicial proof,will become plausible,given that the following three aspects of efforts are put into practice:the accurate implementation of the limited scope,the establishment of diverse methods for judicial proof within the two litigation patterns,and the clarification of the procedural rules of scientific judicial proof.

关 键 词：“以审判为中心” 司法证明 人民陪审员制度 威格摩尔图表法 

分 类 号：D915.13[政治法律—诉讼法学]