在解构与重建之间——艾伦·蒙斯洛的史学理论与实践  

Between Deconstructing and Reconstituting:An Exploration of Alun Munslow’s Historical Theory and Practice

作　　者：邓京力[1] 佟文宇 Deng Jingli;Tong Wenyu

机构地区：[1]首都师范大学历史学院,北京100048

出　　处：《史学史研究》2024年第1期67-82,共16页Journal of Historiography

基　　金：北京市社会科学基金重点项目“史学理论话语体系与学科体系研究”(项目编号:22LSA002)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：作为时任《反思历史:理论与实践杂志》二十年的主编,艾伦·蒙斯洛在海登·怀特和凯斯·詹金斯等人思想的影响之下,于20世纪80-90年代转向史学理论研究,成为后现代史学理论的重要实践者。他一方面质疑传统史学的经验主义认识论原则,指出重构论与建构论之间的区别与联系,从而提出其解构论的思想主张;另一方面,他并不否认过去的客观性,试图运用后认识论的方式重新接触过去,以期重建当下史学理论和历史研究实践的基础。从蒙斯洛解构史学的发展脉络观察,他以“作为历史的过去”“永恒的当下”与“作者-历史学家”为当代史学理论的话语建设提供了某些实验性的新路径,这也体现在其史学实践之中。As the editor⁃in⁃chief of Rethinking History:the Journal of Theory and Practice for twenty years,Alun Munslow turned to the study of historical theory in the 1980s and 1990s under the influence of the ideas of theorists,such as Hayden White and Keith Jenkins,and became an important practitioner of postmodern historical theory.On the one hand,he questioned the empiricist epistemological principles of traditional history,pointing out the difference and connection between reconstructionism and constructionism,thus putting forward his proposition of deconstructionism.On the other hand,he didn’t deny the objectivity of the past,and triesd to re⁃engage with the past by using post⁃epistemology,with a view to reconstituting the basis of the current historical theory and the practice of historical research.Observing the development of Munslow’s deconstructing historiography,he provided some new experimental paths for the discourse construction of contemporary historical theory with“the past as history”,“perpetual present”and“the author⁃historian”.Furthermore,this is also reflectes in his historical practice.

关 键 词：艾伦·蒙斯洛 解构论 作为历史的过去 永恒的当下 作者-历史学家 《反思历史杂志》 

分 类 号：K091[历史地理—历史学]