检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈立华 Chen Lihua(Department of Neurosurgery,Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences·Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital,Chengdu 610072,China)
机构地区:[1]四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院神经外科,成都610072
出 处:《中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版)》2024年第1期1-7,共7页Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition)
摘 要:中小型前庭神经鞘瘤(VS)有多种治疗策略,包括显微外科手术(MS)、立体定向放射外科治疗(SRS)和随访观察(CT),其在肿瘤控制和面神经功能方面的结果相似,在疾病控制和并发症方面提供了良好的效果,主要区别在于对听力的保护。目前关于中小型VS最佳的治疗方法仍存在争议,尤其是对听力正常的年轻患者治疗的必要性和听力保护的最佳时机也存有争议,临床上需在个体化地、合理的选择治疗模式。本文对中小型VS的3种治疗模式的优缺点进行总结分析,旨在实现长期功能保存和提高患者的生活质量。There are various treatment strategies for small and medium-sized vestibular schwannoma(VS),including microsurgery(MS),stereotactic radiosurgery surgery(SRS),and conservative treatment(CT).The three treatment plans have similar results in tumor control and facial nerve function,providing good results in disease control and complications,with the main difference being the protection of hearing.At present,the optimal treatment method for small and medium-sized VS is still controversial,especially for young patients with normal hearing,the necessity of treatment,and the optimal timing for hearing protection.In clinical practice,it is necessary to choose the treatment mode individually and reasonably.This article summarizes and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of three treatment modes,aiming to achieve long-term functional preservation and improve the quality of life of patients.
关 键 词:中小型前庭神经鞘瘤 显微外科手术 立体定向放射外科治疗 随访观察 听力保护
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170