基于资金约束的竞争供应链融资策略研究  

Financing Strategies of Competitive Supply Chain Based on Financial-constraint

作　　者：杜文意 张永悦[1] DU Wenyi;ZHANG Yongyue(Business School,Jiangsu Normal University,Xuzhou 221116,China;Research Center for Modern Logistics and Supply Chain,Jiangsu Normal University,Xuzhou 221116,China)

机构地区：[1]江苏师范大学商学院,江苏徐州221116 [2]江苏师范大学现代物流与供应链研究中心,江苏徐州221116

出　　处：《控制工程》2024年第4期644-653,共10页Control Engineering of China

基　　金：国家社会科学基金后期资助一般项目(21FGLB039);国家自然科学基金青年项目(71702067);江苏省“青蓝工程”项目(苏教师[2021]11号);江苏师范大学研究生科研与实践创新计划校级项目(2021XKT0717)。

摘　　要：针对制造商存在资金约束时供应链成员的运营问题,分别研究了链与链竞争的结构中无资金约束、有资金约束且不融资、融资有利息且批发价格无折扣、融资无利息且批发价格有折扣4种不同模式下供应链成员的利润。当制造商存在资金约束时,其所在供应链上的零售商倾向于融资无利息且批发价格有折扣的模式。除了有资金约束且不融资的模式外,其他3种模式下竞争强度的增大不利于2条供应链上成员利润的提高。相同的竞争强度下,制造商可以通过调整单位生产成本投入来改变自己及竞争方的最优决策策略,进而影响供应链成员的利润。最后,仿真结果验证了所得结论。For the operational problems of supply chain members when the manufacturer has the financial-constraint,the profits of supply chain members are studied under four different modes of chain-to-chain competition structure.The four modes are no financial-constraint,financial-constraint with no financing,financing with rate but no discount,financing with discount but no rate.When the manufacturer has financial-constraint,the retailer in the same supply chain tends to the mode of financing with discount but no rate.Besides the mode of financial-constraint with no financing,the increase of competition intensity is not conducive to the improvement of members’profits in the two supply chains under the other three modes.Under the same competition intensity,the manufacturer can change the optimal decision-making strategies of itself and the competitor by adjusting the unit production cost input,thus affecting the profits of supply chain members.Finally,the simulation results verify the above conclusions.

关 键 词：资金约束 融资模式 竞争供应链 运营策略 价格折扣 

分 类 号：F274[经济管理—企业管理] TP301[经济管理—国民经济]