检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:兰跃军[1] 张跃 LAN Yuejun;ZHANG Yue(Shanghai University,Shanghai 200444;Jurong City People's Procuratorate,Jiangsu 212400)
机构地区:[1]上海大学法学院 [2]江苏省句容市人民检察院
出 处:《犯罪研究》2024年第1期27-38,共12页Chinese Criminology Review
基 金:2022年国家社科基金后期资助项目“法秩序统一原理下性侵未成年被害人保护研究”(项目编号:22FFXB033)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:自行补充侦查权是中国语境下检察侦查权的重要组成部分,在检察机关作为国家法律监督机关定位下具有独特的诉讼价值与制度功能。但是,立法的缺失和现实的掣肘导致自行补充侦查权在实践中未能实现其应有的价值。激活这一休眠的检察侦查权,不仅是检察监督本位之思考,还是检察工作现代化之所需。从强化检察侦查权监督性的视角出发,分析自行补充侦查权的实施困境及成因,应当着力从规范化设计、侦查能力建设、协作与制约双向模式三方面探索自行补充侦查权的改革进路与完善路径。The power of voluntary supplementary investigation is an important part of the prosecutorial investigation power in China,which has unique institutional value and functional significance considering that the prosecutorial organs serve as the legal supervision authority of the state.But the lack of legislation and practical constraints have led to the failure of voluntary supplementary investigative power in realizing its value in practice.The activation of this dormant prosecutorial investigation power is not only a reflection on the fundamentals of prosecutorial supervision,and is also necessary for the modernization of prosecutorial work.From the perspective of strengthening the supervisory nature of prosecutorial investigation power,this paper examines the difficulties of the implementation of voluntary supplementary investigative powers and causes,and proposes that eforts should be made to explore the reform and improvement paths for voluntary supplementary investigative powers from three aspects:standardized design,investigation capacity building,and a two-way model of collaboration and restriction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.189.95