多声知识场域中作者身份构建比较  

A Comparative Study of Authorship Construction in Multi-sound Sites of Knowledge

作　　者：单宇[1] 白芸 廖锐 SHAN Yu;BAI Yun;LIAO Rui

机构地区：[1]中南大学,长沙410083 [2]国防科技大学,南京210039

出　　处：《当代外语研究》2024年第1期102-112,共11页Contemporary Foreign Language Studies

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“中国翻译理论发展史研究”(编号20&ZD312);国家社科基金中华学术外译项目“《史记》文学经典的建构之路”(编号22WZWA001);湖南省哲学社会科学基金重点项目“后疫情时代来华留学生科技汉语教材评价与研发”(编号20ZDB032);广东外语外贸大学翻译学研究中心科研招标项目“社会翻译学视域下清代科技译者群体研究”(编号CTS202202)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：参引是连接学术空间多主体的重要桥梁,也是学术知识再概念化、再语境化阐释的关键手段。聚焦语言学参引,将形式与介入资源有机结合,建立作者身份评价模型,分析被引作者—作者—读者多声知识场域中,英汉期刊作者的声音传达偏好。结果表明,国际文化背景作者倾向在被引作者—作者场域突出其评价者身份,积极评论被引观点并模糊被引作者声音;汉文化背景作者偏好在作者—读者场域强化自身论辩身份,输出个人立场以劝谏读者,弱化读者潜在声音。传统文化、人际模式、权威取向、批判式教育等语境背景与参引紧密相关,文章结合知识翻译观从参引格式、参引内容、术语重构三方面提出建议。Citation is an important bridge connecting multiple subjects in academic communication,and also a key means for re-conceptualization and re-contextualization of academic knowledge.Focusing on linguistics citations,this paper combines the form of citations with engagement resources,establishes an evaluation model of authorship,in order to explore the communication preferences of English and Chinese journals in the author-author-reader multi-voice site of knowledge.The results show that authors with international culture background highlight their identities of evaluators by commenting on the cited points and blur cited authors voices in the author-cited author voice site;while authors with Chinese culture background prefer to emphasize their identities of debaters in the author-reader site,taking their own stances to persuade readers and weaken the potential voices of them.The different cultural backgrounds of traditional cognition,interpersonal models,authoritative orientations,and critical education are closely related to citation of preference,and suggestions on the reconstruction of citation format,citation content,and terms are put forward underpinned by epistemic translation concept.

关 键 词：参引 多声 知识翻译观 作者身份 

分 类 号：H087[语言文字—语言学]