检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:央金卓嘎 王中华[2] 索朗玉珍 Yang Jin Zhuoga;Wang Zhonghua;Suo Lang Yuzhen(College of Medicine,Tibet University;People's Hospital of Tibet Autonomous Region,Lhasa,Tibet 850000,China)
机构地区:[1]西藏大学医学院 [2]西藏自治区人民医院,西藏拉萨850000
出 处:《西藏医药》2024年第2期35-37,共3页Tibetan Medicine
摘 要:目的分析拉萨地区(ERCP)术后发生胰腺炎(PEP)、高淀粉酶血症(PEHA)患者的危险因素。方法选取2018年1月~2021年1月我院行ERCP的患者414例。将术后发生PEP设为观察组(97例)、将PEHA设为对照组(317例)。分析两组一般资料、辅助检查、手术操作信息与PEP、PEHA的关系。结果本研究PEP发生率9.4%,PEHA发生率14%;影响PEP发生的危险因素:有年龄<60岁、女性、内镜乳头括约肌切开(EST)、术后24h白细胞计数(WBC)。结论需严格掌握ERCP适应症,识别高危患者,早期予以预防措施,减少PEHA向PEP转变、减少重度PEP的发生。Objective To analyze the risk factors of post-ERCP pancreatitis(PEP)and hyperamylasemia(PEHA)in Lhasa region.Methods A total of 414 patients who underwent ERCP in our hospital from January 2018 to January 2021 were selected.The patients with PEP after surgery were set as the observation group(97 cases),and the patients with PEHA were set as the control group(317 cases).The relationship between general data,auxiliary examination,surgical operation information and PEP,PEHA of the two groups was analyzed.Results The incidence of PEP and PEHA was 9.4%and 14%,respectively.The risk fac-tors of PEP included age<60 years,female,endoscopic sphincterotomy(EST)and 24h postoperative white blood cell count(WBC).Conclusion The indications of ERCP should be strictly controlled,the high-risk patients should be identified,and early preventive measures should be taken to reduce the conversion of PEHA to PEP and the occurrence of severe PEP.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.74.90