撤回公诉中证据不足案件的责任汇集、卸除与再分配——以司法领域卸责理论为视角  

Collection,removal and redistribution of responsibilities for cases with insufficient evidence in the withdrawal of public prosecutions——from the perspective of the theory of shirking responsibility in the judicial field

作　　者：张英哲 Zhang Yingzhe(People’s Public Security University of China,Beijing 100045,China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民公安大学,北京100045

出　　处：《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》2024年第1期79-87,共9页Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice

摘　　要：撤回公诉问题作为刑事诉讼程序的顽疾,一直被理论界和实务界所关注。从卸责理论的角度分析,撤回起诉程序实质上是一种疑难案件责任风险流动和再分配的过程。证据不足案件的责任产生于侦查阶段,通过撤回公诉,案件责任被拦截于法院,并重新回流至检察机关。撤回公诉后,检察机关将案件责任通过侦查机关和被告人卸除,但因此造成案件处理效力不明,从而损害被告人权益。为完善撤回公诉制度,需要通过弱化检察机关的卸责机制、加强被告人的责任承担能力等途径,对证据不足案件的责任风险进行再分配。The issue of withdrawal of public prosecution,as a chronic disease of criminal procedure,has always been concerned by theoretical and practical circles.From the perspective of the theory of shirking responsibility,the withdrawal of prosecution procedure is essentially a process of flow and redistribution of liability risks in difficult cases.Responsibility for cases with insufficient evidence arises at the investigation stage.By withdrawing public prosecution,the responsibility for the case is intercepted by the court and flows back to the prosecutor’s office.After withdrawing the public prosecution,the procuratorate removed responsibility for the case through the investigative agency and the defendant.However,the effectiveness of the case handling was unclear,thereby damaging the rights and interests of the defendant.In order to improve the system of withdrawing public prosecutions,it is necessary to redistribute the liability risks of cases with insufficient evidence by weakening the procuratorial organ’s shirking mechanism and strengthening the defendant’s ability to bear responsibility.

关 键 词：撤回公诉 卸责理论 证据不足 被告人权益 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]